Quantitative ultrasonographic diagnostics for midface and mandible fractures.

The aim of this study was to examine whether ultrasonography and three-dimensional radiological procedures produce significantly different measurement results with respect to fracture dislocation. This was a retrospective study of patients who were admitted to the department for oral and maxillofacial surgery of the Medical Highschool Hannover with facial skull fracture and underwent high-resolution computed tomography and ultrasonography imaging during a period from 1 January 2019 to 31 August 2019. A 10 mHz transducer was used for fracture imaging, and the largest dislocation of each fracture was measured. A paired t-test for dependent samples was used for statistical evaluation of the measured differences, and the p-value was set at 0.05. A total of 16 patients with 29 fractures were included. The fractures were characterized as follows: zygomatic arch (n = 7), lateroorbital region (n = 4), maxilla/zygomatic bone (n = 15), mandible (n = 2), and frontal sinus (n = 1). Regardless of the fracture location, we found no statistical difference in fracture measurements between the ultrasonography and the computed tomography (p = 0.17 (fractures of the zygomatic arch) to p = 0.85 (all fractures)). The study findings suggest that ultrasonography not only allows basic detection but also a quantification of the dislocation in facial skull fractures. The ultrasonography results are not significantly different from those of the computed tomography. In everyday clinical practice, ultrasonography of facial fractures can be considered an adequate imaging procedure. If used correctly, additional radiation exposure to the patient can be avoided, thus representing a diagnostic alternative to computed tomography.