AI Article Synopsis

  • SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia has led to many cases of severe respiratory failure needing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), prompting this study on the effectiveness of combining noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO).
  • A retrospective analysis of 128 ICU patients showed that those receiving both HFNO and NIV had a significantly lower rate of endotracheal intubation compared to those on HFNO alone, with findings supported by various statistical analyses.
  • While day-28 mortality rates were similar between the two groups, NIV was linked to more days without IMV, highlighting its potential benefit in treating critically ill patients.

Article Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is responsible for unprecedented numbers of acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). This work aimed to assess whether adding face-mask noninvasive ventilation (NIV) to high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) was associated with a reduced need for endotracheal intubation.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from July 2020 to January 2021 in two tertiary care intensive care units (ICUs) in Paris, France. Patients admitted for laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure requiring HFNO with or without NIV were included. The primary outcome was the rate of endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included day-28 mortality, day-28 respiratory support and IMV free days, ICU and hospital length-of-stay. Sensitivity analyses with both propensity score matching and overlap weighting were used.

Results: One hundred twenty-eight patients were included, 88 (69%) received HFNO alone and 40 (31%) received additional NIV. Additional NIV was associated with a reduced rate of endotracheal intubation in multivariate analysis (53 [60%] vs. 15 [38%], HR=0.46 [95% CI: 0.23-0.95], P=0.04). Sensitivity analyses by propensity score matching (HR=0.45 [95% CI: 0.24-0.84], P=0.01) and overlap weighting (HR=0.52 [95% CI: 0.28-0.94], P=0.03) were consistent. Day-28 mortality was 25 (28%) in the HFNO group and 8 (20%) in the NIV group (HR=0.75 [95% CI: 0.15-3.82], P=0.72). NIV was associated with higher IMV free days (20 [0-28] vs. 28 [14-28], P=0.015). All sensitivity analyses were consistent regarding secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Need for endotracheal intubation was lower in critically-ill SARS-CoV-2 patients receiving face-mask noninvasive mechanical ventilation in addition to high-flow oxygen therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16094-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endotracheal intubation
16
face-mask noninvasive
12
propensity score
12
sensitivity analyses
12
noninvasive ventilation
8
critically-ill sars-cov-2
8
sars-cov-2 patients
8
high-flow nasal
8
nasal oxygen
8
respiratory failure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!