A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Accurate reconstruction of bone defects in orbital-maxillary-zygomatic (OMZ) complex with polyetheretherketone (PEEK). | LitMetric

Accurate reconstruction of bone defects in orbital-maxillary-zygomatic (OMZ) complex with polyetheretherketone (PEEK).

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, National Clinical Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai 200011, China. Electronic address:

Published: May 2022

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using patient-specific polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for the reconstruction of patients with defects in orbital-maxillary-zygomatic (OMZ) complex.

Patients And Methods: This study included 12 patients who underwent primary/delayed reconstruction of defects in OMZ complex by using patient-specific PEEK implants. Postoperative appearance (facial and orbital symmetry) and function were assessed after 6 months. Ophthalmologic examinations including globe position, exophthalmos, and orbital volume measurement were also performed. A comparative analysis of the treatment outcomes between pre- and postoperation was performed, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results: All patients underwent planned surgical procedure successfully. No obvious complications occurred. Facial symmetry and globe position were improved after surgery and the postoperative esthetic assessment was rated as excellent. The postoperative evaluation revealed that exophthalmos was 15.91 ± 1.80 mm, vertical position difference of eyeball 15.91 ± 1.80 mm, and orbital volume 15.91 ± 1.80 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean values of exophthalmos, vertical position difference, and orbital volume among pre- and postoperation conditions, whereas there was no statistically significant difference between the reconstructed side and the unaffected side after surgery.

Conclusion: With the aid of virtual surgical planning and individual custom-made surgical guides, patient-specific PEEK implantation can successfully reconstruct the complicated 3D structure of OMZ complex and shows excellent biocompatibility and clinical outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.101DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

omz complex
12
orbital volume
12
defects orbital-maxillary-zygomatic
8
orbital-maxillary-zygomatic omz
8
polyetheretherketone peek
8
patients underwent
8
patient-specific peek
8
globe position
8
pre- postoperation
8
vertical position
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!