Objectives: This study evaluated the surface microhardness of composite, affected by surface coating with different dental adhesive systems.
Materials And Methods: A total of 100 composite discs were divided into five groups. Group 1 was uncoated (control group C), and groups 2 to 5 were coated with different adhesive systems (OptiBond FL: FL, OptiBond SOLO Plus: SOLO, OptiBond XTR: XTR, and OptiBond All in one: AIO, respectively). The Vickers microhardness (VHN) was measured without and with 500 thermocycles.
Statistical Analysis: The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posthoc test at the 95% confidence level.
Results: At 24 hours, the VHN of C (59.96 ± 3.68) and FL (59.83 ± 4.54) were significantly higher than SOLO (51.73 ± 4.63) and AIO (51.45 ± 4.11). The VHN of XTR (54.96 ± 3.68) was not significant compared with that of C and all other groups. After thermocycling, VHN were significantly decreased in all groups. However, there were no significant differences among all groups.
Conclusions: At 24 hours, composite coated with different adhesive systems have different effects to VHN. Thermocycling all adhesive resin systems coated on composite surface significantly decreased the VHN.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9683890 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740221 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!