Transparency on Platelet Transfusion in Routine Cancer Care: The Key for Optimal Blood Usage?

Introduction: In Germany, up to 75% of platelet concentrates (PCs) are administered to haematological and oncological patients. Only limited transparency exists on the characteristics of haematological/oncological patients receiving PC transfusions, treatment patterns, and guideline adherence in daily clinical routine care. This information would be key for managing platelet supply and optimal platelet usage strategies. This study aimed to analyse data from clinical routine transfusions to fill the aforementioned information gaps and to create an inventory as a blueprint for electronic data capturing systems that allow simplified, recurring analyses.

Methods: Prospective open-label, single-centre, observational study in a German tertiary teaching haematological/oncological setting. All inpatients who received any transfusion of PCs (pathogen-inactivated or conventional) in routine use over a period of 3 months (March 2015-May 2015) were consecutively included. Except for age (≥18 years), no exclusion criteria were applied. For guideline adherence, the Cross-Sectional Guidelines for Therapy with Blood Components and Plasma Derivatives - amended edition 2020 were used. An inventory blueprint was created through a narrative literature review and the data collected in this study.

Results: Ninety-four patients received 942 PCs. The mean (±SD) age was 54.6 (±13.9) years, 68% were male and 86% were diagnosed with a haematological disease. Thirteen patients received 42% of all transfused PCs. The mean ± SD number of transfused PC per patient was 10.81 ± 9.24. Five (0.5% per transfusion) minor adverse events were documented. Approximately 19% of PCs were not administered according to existing guidelines. The mean transfusion interval was 1.71 ± 1.1 days, and the mean increment was 12.62 ± 14.7 G/L. The inventory showed which platelet transfusion-specific data should be documented for answering questions in terms of quality, effectiveness, and management of PC transfusions.

Conclusions: Platelet transfusions in a haematological/oncological setting are highly individual in terms of the total number of transfusions and transfusion intervals. The majority of all PC transfusions were given to only a small group of patients. Continuous, structured real-world data collection/evaluation and benchmarking with data from more centres seems essential in determining specific needs in this vulnerable patient group, assessing the quality of transfusion practices, determining effectiveness, and anticipating future demand for platelets and a sustainable blood supply. So far, not all relevant data are collected routinely. The advancing digitalization of health systems offers opportunities to collect and link data and thus make them more accessible and evaluable.