Central fixation element type and length affect glenoid baseplate micromotion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg

Centre for Health Innovation, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: July 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) can fail due to glenoid component loosening, prompting the need for revision surgery; this study explored factors affecting micromotion of glenoid baseplates in RSA.
  • An experiment evaluated four factors: type of central fixation (peg vs. screw), length of cortical engagement, type of peripheral screw (locking vs. nonlocking), and density of bone surrogate used; central peg fixation showed the most micromotion.
  • Results indicated that using a central screw with longer engagement reduced micromotion significantly, suggesting these choices can help decrease the risk of glenoid loosening and the need for further surgery.

Article Abstract

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly used to treat patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Loosening of the glenoid component remains one of the principal modes of failure and represents a significant complication that requires revision surgery. This study assessed the effects of various factors on glenoid baseplate micromotion for primary fixation of RSA.

Materials And Methods: A half-fractional factorial design of experiment was used to assess 4 factors: central element type (central peg or screw), central cortical engagement according to length (13.5 or 23.5 mm), anterior-posterior peripheral screw type (nonlocking or locking), and cancellous bone surrogate density (160 or 400 kg/m, 10 or 25 PCF). Glenoid baseplates were implanted into high- or low-density Sawbones rigid polyurethane foam blocks and cyclically loaded at 60° for 1000 cycles (500-N compressive force range) using a custom-designed loading apparatus. Micromotion at the 4 peripheral screw positions was recorded using linear variable differential transformers.

Results: Central peg fixation generated 358% greater micromotion at all peripheral screw positions compared with central screw fixation (P < .001). Baseplates with short central elements that lacked cortical bone engagement generated 328% greater micromotion than those with long central elements (P = .001). No significant effects were observed when varying anterior-posterior peripheral screw type or bone surrogate density. There were significant interactions between central element type and length (P < .001).

Discussion: A central screw and a long central element that engaged cortical bone reduced RSA baseplate micromotion. These findings serve to inform surgical decision making regarding baseplate fixation elements to minimize the risk of glenoid loosening and, thus, the need for revision surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.120DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peripheral screw
12
element type
8
glenoid baseplate
8
baseplate micromotion
8
reverse shoulder
8
shoulder arthroplasty
8
central peg
8
micromotion peripheral
8
screw positions
8
central
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!