Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The integration of oxygen cost into the accelerometer's algorithms improves accuracy of total energy expenditure (TEE) values as post-stroke individuals walk. Recent work has shown that oxygen cost can be estimated from specific prediction equations for stroke patients.
Objective: The objective is to the validity of the different oxygen cost estimation equations available in the literature for calculating TEE using ActigraphGT3x as individuals with stroke sequelae walk.
Method: Individuals with stroke sequelae who were able to walk without human assistance were included. The TEE was calculated by multiplying the walking distance provided by an ActigraphGT3x worn on the healthy ankle and the patient's oxygen cost estimated from the selected prediction equations. The TEE values from each equation were compared to the TEE values measured by indirect calorimetry. The validity of the prediction methods was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis (mean bias (MB) and limits of agreement (LoA) values).
Results: We included 26 stroke patients (63.5 years). Among the selected equations, those of Compagnat and Polese obtained the best validity parameters for the ActigraphGT3x: MB = 1.2 kcal, 95% LoA = [-12.0; 14.3] kcal and MB = 3.5 kcal, 95% LoA = [-9.2; 16.1] kcal. For comparison, the estimated TEE value according to the manufacturer's algorithm reported MB = -15 kcal, 95% LoA = [-52.9; 22.8] kcal.
Conclusion: The Polese and Compagnat equations offer the best validity parameters in comparison with the criterion method. Using oxygen cost prediction equations is a promising approach to improving assessment of TEE by accelerometers in post-stroke individuals.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15459683221076469 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!