A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Behavioural Interventions in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the impact of behavioral interventions on individuals with oropharyngeal dysphagia by conducting systematic literature searches and performing meta-analyses on randomized controlled trials.
  • A total of 37 studies were analyzed, revealing significant positive effects of behavioral interventions, particularly through rehabilitative and combined approaches compared to traditional treatments.
  • While the results are promising, the authors caution that the high variability among studies means that the findings should be interpreted carefully when making broad conclusions.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of behavioural interventions in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Methods: Systematic literature searches were conducted to retrieve randomized controlled trials in four different databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed). The methodological quality of eligible articles was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2), after which meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 37 studies were included. Overall, a significant, large pre-post interventions effect size was found. To compare different types of interventions, all behavioural interventions and conventional dysphagia treatment comparison groups were categorised into compensatory, rehabilitative, and combined compensatory and rehabilitative interventions. Overall, significant treatment effects were identified favouring behavioural interventions. In particular, large effect sizes were found when comparing rehabilitative interventions with no dysphagia treatment, and combined interventions with compensatory conventional dysphagia treatment. When comparing selected interventions versus conventional dysphagia treatment, significant, large effect sizes were found in favour of Shaker exercise, chin tuck against resistance exercise, and expiratory muscle strength training.

Conclusions: Behavioural interventions show promising effects in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia. However, due to high heterogeneity between studies, generalisations of meta-analyses need to be interpreted with care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836405PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030685DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

behavioural interventions
20
dysphagia treatment
16
people oropharyngeal
12
conventional dysphagia
12
interventions
10
interventions people
8
oropharyngeal dysphagia
8
compensatory rehabilitative
8
rehabilitative interventions
8
large sizes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!