A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Avenir® vs. Axium Coils for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial With Short-Term Follow-Up. | LitMetric

Purpose: Endovascular coil occlusion is a successful and rapidly evolving strategy used to treat patients who present with intracranial aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the Avenir® and Axium passive mechanically detachable coil systems.

Methods: A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study was carried out at ten medical centers from March 2018 to December 2019. A series of consecutive patients diagnosed with intracranial aneurysms were randomly assigned to undergo endovascular treatment with either the Avenir® or the Axium mechanically detachable coil systems. The short-term outcomes from the two groups were compared with a focus on treatment efficacy and safety.

Results: A total of 162 and 161 patients were enrolled in the Avenir and Axium groups, respectively. The rate of successful coil detachment was 100% for the Avenir group and 99.38% for the Axium group. At the six-month follow-up visit, the overall aneurysm occlusion rate was 94.66% for the Avenir group and 96.95% for the Axium group ( > 0.05). We observed no statistically significant differences in clinical condition (as per the modified Rankin Scale) or the degree of aneurysm occlusion (as determined by digital subtraction angiography [DSA] and Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification). Surgical complications were reported in 27 subjects in the Avenir group and 22 in the Axium group ( > 0.05). DSA performed at 6 months revealed complete aneurysm occlusion in 84 and 86% of patients in the Avenir and Axium groups, respectively.

Conclusion: We observed no significant short-term differences with respect to efficacy or safety when using either Avenir® or Axium coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825471PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.817989DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

avenir® axium
16
intracranial aneurysms
16
avenir group
12
axium group
12
aneurysm occlusion
12
axium coils
8
coils treatment
8
treatment intracranial
8
multicenter randomized
8
randomized controlled
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!