Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: July 2022

Introduction: This study aimed to survey retention protocols and retainer characteristics among orthodontists practicing in Canada.

Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed to 576 orthodontists registered with the Canadian Association of Orthodontists. It included respondents' demographic details, preferred orthodontic retainers and prescribed wear protocol, adjunctive retention procedures, the timing of retention follow-ups, retainer choice in specific situations, and retainer characteristics. Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to test the associations between variables.

Results: An 18% response rate was recorded (n = 101). Vacuum-formed retainers were the most commonly used retainers in the maxilla (50.5%), whereas bonded retainers were preferred in the mandible (54.5%). An initial full-time removable retainer wear period was commonly prescribed (63.0%-67.0%). Retainer checks were carried out by 85.1%-89.1% of orthodontists for 1 or 2 years after the end of active orthodontic treatment. Only 44.6%-56.4% were comfortable with general dentists continuing retainer checks. Most (72.5%-84.1%) retainers were fabricated in the orthodontists' office laboratory. Indefinite retainer wear was commonly suggested and was significantly influenced by the number of years in practice.

Conclusions: Most orthodontists' preferred retainer was the vacuum-formed retainers in the maxilla and the bonded retainers in the mandible. A variety of retention protocols and retainer characteristics was evident among orthodontists that reflect the considerable variation in malocclusion traits we face day-to-day. There seems to be a potential dichotomy between orthodontists being uncomfortable about allowing general dental practitioners to manage retention and orthodontists unwilling to provide retention care indefinitely.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retainer characteristics
12
retainer
9
orthodontists
8
orthodontists practicing
8
retention protocols
8
protocols retainer
8
vacuum-formed retainers
8
retainers maxilla
8
bonded retainers
8
retainer wear
8

Similar Publications

Effect of post-processing on the surface, optical, mechanical, and dimensional properties of 3D-printed orthodontic clear retainers.

Clin Oral Investig

January 2025

School of Materials Science and Innovation, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Phuttamonthon District, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.

Objectives: To address the high surface roughness and poor optical properties of three-dimensional (3D) printed orthodontic clear retainers, an alternative post-processing protocol was investigated with the goal of achieving improved surface, optical, and mechanical properties while preserving dimensional accuracy.

Materials And Methods: Samples were prepared from two biocompatible methacrylate-based 3D-printing resins (Formlabs Dental LT Clear V2, NextDent OrthoFlex) and one thermoplastic material (Duran). For the 3D-printed resins, one group was post-processed by rinsing in isopropyl alcohol, while another group was centrifuged before post-curing in glycerine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Statement Of Problem: Different factors affect 3-dimensionally (3D) printed resin products. However, evidence on the effect of the print orientation on resin dental devices is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of print orientation on the properties and accuracy of 3D printed implant surgical guides, occlusal devices, clear orthodontic retainers, and aligners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study investigated the physical, mechanical, and optical properties of 3-dimensional (3D) printing resins compared with thermoplastic materials to evaluate their suitability for the fabrication of orthodontic clear retainers.

Methods: Samples were prepared from thermoplastic sheets (Duran [Scheu-Dental GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany] and Zendura [Bay Materials LLC, Fremont, Calif]) and biocompatible 3D-printing resins (Dental LT Clear V2 [Formlabs Inc, Somerville, Mass] and OrthoFlex [Nextdent BV, Soesterberg, The Netherlands]) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The materials were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and water sorption tests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the orthodontic retention protocols used by Brazilian orthodontists.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 693 orthodontists who answered a web-based questionnaire with 22 questions regarding the participants' characteristics, their retainers' prescriptions, follow-up duration, and appliance fabrication.

Results: A 20.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study presents the design and validation of a soft sliding stiffness structure with a soft-rigid layer sliding mechanism. It aims to mitigate ankle sprains and address the progression of chronic ankle instability by providing stiffness support. The soft-rigid layer sliding mechanism of the structure is designed to achieve a wide range of stiffness while maintaining a compact form factor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!