Introduction: Studies evaluating outcomes in bladder cancer sub stratified into T2a and T2b pathologic staging have demonstrated inconsistent results. Survival outcomes in a cohort of pure urothelial carcinoma patient undergoing radical cystectomy were evaluated to determine the prognostic value of T2 sub staging.
Methods: Using our prospectively maintained institutional cystectomy database, we identified patients with pure urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, either pT2aN0 or pT2bN0. We excluded any patients with variant histology, patients that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and patients that had margin positive disease. Demographic and clinicopathologic data were collected, and Cox proportional hazard regression assessed overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and recurrence free survival (RFS).
Results: From 2001 to 2019, we identified 1,929 patients that underwent radical cystectomy, 61 patients had pT2a and 65 had pT2b pure urothelial carcinoma that met inclusion criteria. Only age (P = 0.02) and the initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor pathology (P < 0.01) were notably different when comparing the clinical characteristics of patients with pT2a and pT2b. No differences were noted in OS, CSS, or RFS between the 2 groups on Kaplan-Meier analysis. On univariate Cox regression analysis, age, TURBT stage, cystectomy pathology stage, carcinoma in situ, and lymphovascular invasion status, and Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy status was not found to be significant factors for OS, CSS, or RFS between patients with pT2aN0 or pT2bN0 tumors.
Conclusion: Prior studies have sub stratified pT2a and pT2b, studying survival outcomes with equivocal results. Many of these studies included variant histology or use of chemotherapy in the analysis. Here, we identified a pure urothelial cohort to compare survival outcomes between pT2a and pT2b and found no difference in OS, CSS, and RFS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.12.008 | DOI Listing |
Diagn Pathol
January 2025
Department of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, India, Manipal, 576104.
Background: Muscle-invasive bladder carcinomas (MIBCs) exhibit significant heterogeneity, with diverse histopathological features associated with varied prognosis and therapeutic response. Although genomic profiling studies have identified several molecular subtypes of MIBC, two basic molecular subtypes are identified - luminal and basal, differing in biological behaviour and response to treatment. As molecular subtyping is complex, surrogate immunohistochemical (IHC) markers have been used to determine the molecular subtypes with good correlation to genomic profiling.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBJU Int
January 2025
Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Objective: To investigate the expression patterns of Nectin-4, the target molecule of the antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin (EV), in relation to histological and molecular subtypes of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC).
Patients And Methods: We assessed the protein expression patterns of Nectin-4 in a spatially organised tissue microarray containing 1386 tissue cores from 314 consecutive patients with UBC who underwent radical cystectomy (2005-2018). Results were correlated with clinicopathological and follow-up data, as well as with different spatial locations (tumour central vs tumour-normal interface and primary tumour vs lymph node [LN] metastases).
Clin Genitourin Cancer
December 2024
Department of Urology, Mie University hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Int Urol Nephrol
December 2024
Medical Oncology Clinic, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, 06100, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.
Purpose: Most bladder cancers are pure urothelial carcinomas, but a small portion, approximately 5-10%, have variant histology or are non-urothelial in nature. This research sought to examine the features of and treatment strategies for different types of urothelial carcinoma with variant histologies and non-urothelial bladder cancer.
Methods: The study cohort comprised individuals with non-urothelial and variant urothelial bladder cancers treated at two medical centres in Ankara, Turkey, between 2005 and 2024.
Radiology
December 2024
From the Departments of Radiology (G. Brembilla, M.C., A.D.P., T.R., R.P., S.L., F.D.C.), Urology (G. Basile, M.B., M.M., A.B., F.M.), and Medical Oncology (D.R., C.M., V.T., A.C., D.P., E.C., A.N.), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy (G. Brembilla, G. Basile, M.C., T.R., R.P., D.P., E.C., M.B., M.M., A.B., F.M., A.N., F.D.C.); Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom (F.G.); Department of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (F.G.); Genitourinary Department, Programma Prostata (P.G.) and Department of Radiology (A. Messina, G. Calareso), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (A. Martini); and Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele-Turro, Milan, Italy (G. Cardone).
Background An accurate method of assessing the response of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) to neoadjuvant treatment is needed for selecting candidates for bladder-sparing strategies. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (nacVI-RADS) scores and posttreatment Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scores when assessing MIBC response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis of MRI scans was conducted in patients enrolled in the PURE-01 study (NCT02736266) from February 2017 to December 2019 who underwent pre- and postimmunotherapy mpMRI before radical cystectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!