[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab358.]
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8826014 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac056 | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Rev
January 2025
Lab in Biotechnology and Biosignal Transduction, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 77, Tamil Nadu, India.
Neurosurg Rev
January 2025
Department of Cariology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai, 600 077, India.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
January 2025
Universidad Europea de Valencia, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Dentistry, Valencia, Spain; Universidad de Valencia, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Valencia, Spain. Electronic address:
Micro-osteoperforations and corticotomies are two surgical techniques commonly used to increase the rate of tooth movement. The aim of this systematic review was to respond to the question: Which method used for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement, micro-osteoperforations or alveolar corticotomy, produces a higher rate of tooth movement and present less adverse effects? Searches were performed in the electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, Lilacs and Science Direct, as well as grey literature (Opengrey), up to March 2024. All the included studies were controlled, randomized clinical trials, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, and multicentre studies of patients treated with orthodontics and corticotomies or micro-osteoperforations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!