Clinical Yield of Ileal Intubation During Screening Colonoscopy.

Cureus

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, ARE.

Published: January 2022

Objectives Ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy can serve as supportive evidence of complete examination. However, most studies conducted in Western countries showed a limited value of ileal inspection in asymptomatic patients undergoing colonoscopy. Therefore, our aim is to determine the clinical yield of routine ileal examination during the performance of screening colonoscopy in a cohort of patients in the Middle East and identify factors associated with successful ileal intubation in this setting. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of all screening colonoscopies was performed at a single endoscopy unit. The patients were divided into two groups; group A included patients in whom the extent of examination was the cecum and group B comprised of those who underwent ileal intubation as well. We summarized the endoscopic and pathological findings of the ileoscopic examinations and their clinical impact. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare both groups and to identify factors predictive of ileal intubation in the setting of screening colonoscopy.  Results Two thousand four hundred seventy-three unique completed screening colonoscopies were analyzed (group A=1465 patients, group B=1008 patients). Overall Ileal intubation rate was 40.8%. Of the patients in group B, 3.7% were noted to have findings on ileoscopy, which were deemed to be clinically significant in almost half (1.8% overall). Univariate analysis identified the following factors as being predictive of ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy: patients' age (51.7 vs. 53.5 years, p<0.001), short cecal insertion time, endoscopists' specialty (gastroenterology 42.3% vs. surgery 24.3%, p<0.001), type of colonoscope (pediatric 47.1% vs. adult 33.5% colonoscope, p<0.001), and quality of preparation in the right colon (poor vs. adequate/good : (25.6% vs. 42.5%, p<0.001). Mixed-effects logistic regression identified patients' age, endoscopist specialty, quality of right colon preparation, and cases with short insertion time as independent variables predicting ileal intubation during SC Conclusion The clinical yield of routine ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy is low. Ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy in our cohort was more likely in younger patients with adequate/good right colon preparation and when the exam is performed by a gastroenterologist, in cases with short insertion time. Prospective studies are needed to assess our research findings and to determine the clinical value of routinely intubating terminal ileum during screening colonoscopy in the population of the Middle East.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803374PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20870DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ileal intubation
28
screening colonoscopy
16
intubation screening
12
ileal
9
clinical yield
8
identify factors
8
intubation setting
8
screening colonoscopies
8
factors predictive
8
predictive ileal
8

Similar Publications

The objective was to test the hypothesis that nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy (TME), standardized amino acid (AA) digestibility, and apparent ileal P digestibility are not different in soybean expellers produced from high-oil soybeans (SBE-HO) compared with expellers produced from conventional soybeans (SBE-CV). The two soybean expellers contained approximately 46.3 % crude protein (DM basis).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigated the effectiveness of terminal ileal intubation (TII) during routine colonoscopies, focusing on whether it improves the detection of lesions.
  • A retrospective analysis of 13,372 patients revealed no significant differences in polyp detection rates or lesion detection rates between those who had TII and those who did not.
  • The results concluded that TII is unnecessary in routine colonoscopies due to its limited diagnostic value and lack of benefit in detecting lesions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Conventional colonoscopy vs. cap-assisted colonoscopy: there are differences in colonoscopy performance?].

Rev Gastroenterol Peru

November 2024

Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital San Miguel Arcángel, Panamá, República de Panamá; Sistema Nacional de Investigación (SIN), Panamá, República de Panamá.

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the standard method for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Despite the use of multiple devices, polyp and adenoma detection results have been inconsistent.

Objectives: The main aim of this research is to determine if there have been differences between conventional colonoscopy (CC) and cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) in the diagnosis performance to detect adenomas.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Crohn's disease (CD) can be tricky to diagnose because it causes inflammation that can skip areas of the intestines, particularly in the terminal ileum (TI), leading to potential mismanagement of the condition.
  • - A study of 202 patients showed that 22.3% had inflammation in areas not seen during standard ileo-colonoscopy, with 24.5% having skip lesions mainly in the ileum, and strictures being missed in about 36.2% of cases without additional imaging.
  • - The research highlights the importance of using cross-sectional imaging techniques, as they help identify more cases of active CD and stricturing disease that may go undetected with just ileo-colonoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!