Background: Anti-LW is rarely identified, and it is known to have little clinical importance. However, it is often difficult to differentiate anti-LW from anti-D.

Methods: Here, we report a case where anti-LW was identified for pretransfusion testing in a patient suspected of having lymphoma.

Results: His blood group was O RhD-positive. Anti-D specificity, weak panreactivity and 2+ reactivity in auto control were shown as a result of antibody identification. The reactions became weaker with DTT-treated RBCs, which confirmed the specificity of an anti-LW. The patient received 8 units of O RhD-positive pRBC before discharge without any transfusion reaction.

Conclusions: In conclusion, anti-LWs may show mimicking specificity of anti-D for antibody identification testing, but their clinical significance is completely different. Therefore, their prompt identification is important.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210603DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antibody identification
8
anti-lw
5
anti-lw confused
4
confused anti-d
4
anti-d case
4
case transfused
4
transfused rhd-positive
4
rhd-positive rbcs
4
rbcs literature
4
literature review
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!