A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of fusion versus non-fusion surgery for retro-odontoid pseudotumor with atlanto-axial subluxation. | LitMetric

Background: Due to the limited number of reports comparing posterior fusion with posterior decompression alone for retro-odontoid pseudotumor, there remains no consensus on treatment preference, especially in older patients. This study compared posterior fusion (with or without additional decompression) with posterior decompression alone for treating spinal cord pressure from non-inflammatory retro-odontoid pseudotumor with atlanto-axial subluxation (AAS).

Methods: Forty-one patients (27 male and 14 female; mean age, 73.0 ± 11.4 years) who underwent either posterior cervical fusion or decompression alone for the treatment of non-inflammatory retro-odontoid pseudotumor with AAS and were observed for more than 1 year between September 2009 and July 2019 were enrolled. Thirty-two patients (23 male and 9 female; mean age: 71.8 ± 10.9 years) received posterior fusion surgery (fusion group) and 9 patients (4 male and 5 female; mean age: 77.2 ± 12.5 years) underwent decompression alone (non-fusion group). We compared pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and preoperative cervical alignment parameters between the groups.

Results: In the fusion group, the mean preoperative JOA score was significantly improved from 9.0 ± 3.2 points to 11.7 ± 3.2 points at the final follow-up ( = 0.0002). Similarly in the non-fusion group, the mean preoperative and final follow-up JOA scores were 8.2 ± 3.5 points and 11.7 ± 3.8 points, respectively ( 0.003). The recovery rate at the final follow-up was 22.6% in the fusion group and 43.4% in the non-fusion group, which were statistically comparable ( 0.23). We observed no remarkable correlations between cervical sagittal spinal alignment parameters and JOA score recovery rate in the cohort, nor was any significant subluxation progression seen.

Conclusion: Compared with fusion surgery, surgical decompression alone may be a suitable and less invasive option for the treatment of non-inflammatory retro-odontoid pseudotumor with AAS, especially in elderly patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820057PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100064DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retro-odontoid pseudotumor
20
posterior fusion
12
non-inflammatory retro-odontoid
12
patients male
12
male female
12
female age
12
fusion group
12
non-fusion group
12
final follow-up
12
pseudotumor atlanto-axial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!