Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet

Programa de Pós-graduação em Nutrição do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.

Published: March 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the impact of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on blood sugar control and pregnancy outcomes among women with pregestational diabetes.
  • In a nonrandomized controlled trial involving 89 pregnant women, those using CCM showed better results in reducing fasting and postprandial blood glucose compared to those using the traditional method (TM), particularly in the second and third trimesters.
  • Despite both methods helping to improve postprandial blood glucose levels, no significant differences were found in maternal or perinatal outcomes, though cesarean deliveries were common and linked to hypertensive disorders.

Article Abstract

Objective:  To evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods:  Nonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM and received prenatal care in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2009 and 2014, subdivided into historic control group and intervention group, not simultaneous. The intervention group ( = 51) received nutritional guidance from the carbohydrate counting method (CCM), and the historical control group ( = 38), was guided by the traditional method (TM). The Mann-Whitney test or the Wilcoxon test were used to compare intra- and intergroup outcomes and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures, corrected by the Bonferroni post-hoc test, was used to assess postprandial blood glucose.

Results:  Only the CCM group showed a reduction in fasting blood glucose. Postprandial blood glucose decreased in the 2 ( = 0.00) and 3 ( = 0.00) gestational trimester in the CCM group, while in the TM group the reduction occurred only in the 2 trimester ( = 0.015). For perinatal outcomes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there were no differences between groups. Cesarean delivery was performed in 82% of the pregnant women and was associated with hypertensive disorders (gestational hypertension or pre-eclampsia;  = 0.047).

Conclusion:  Both methods of nutritional guidance contributed to the reduction of postprandial glycemia of women and no differences were observed for maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, CCM had a better effect on postprandial glycemia and only this method contributed to reducing fasting blood glucose throughout the intervention.

Rebec Clinical Trials Database:  The present study was registered in the ReBEC Clinical Trials Database (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR-524z9n).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9948103PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742291DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carbohydrate counting
12
counting method
12
women pregestational
12
perinatal outcomes
12
pregnant women
12
blood glucose
12
pregestational diabetes
8
diabetes mellitus
8
controlled clinical
8
clinical trial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!