Olfactory camouflage and communication in birds.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc

Department of Behavioural Ecology, Bielefeld University, Konsequenz 45, Bielefeld, 33615, Germany.

Published: June 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • Smell is an important but often overlooked aspect of bird behavior and ecology, particularly regarding the preen oil produced by the uropygial gland, which varies by season and sex.
  • A systematic review revealed seasonal differences in preen oil in 95% of species studied and sex differences in 47%, indicating significant variations that may affect olfactory communication and predator detection.
  • The findings suggest that ground-nesting birds might be more susceptible to olfactory predators, supporting the olfactory crypsis hypothesis, while sex differences in preen oil are more evident during breeding and in species with uniparental care, aligning with both olfactory hypetheses.

Article Abstract

Smell is a sensory modality that is rarely considered in birds, but evidence is mounting that olfaction is an important aspect of avian behaviour and ecology. The uropygial gland produces an odoriferous secretion (preen oil) that can differ seasonally and between the sexes. These differences are hypothesized to function in olfactory camouflage, i.e. minimizing detection by nest predators (olfactory crypsis hypothesis), and/or intraspecific olfactory communication, particularly during breeding (sex semiochemical hypothesis). However, evidence for seasonal and sex differences in preen oil is mixed, with some studies finding differences and others not, and direct evidence for the putative function(s) of seasonal variation and sex differences in preen oil remains limited. We conducted a systematic review of the evidence for such changes in preen oil chemical composition, finding seasonal differences in 95% of species (57/60 species in 35 studies) and sex differences in 47% of species (28/59 species in 46 studies). We then conducted phylogenetic comparative analyses using data from 59 bird species to evaluate evidence for both the olfactory crypsis and sex semiochemical hypotheses. Seasonal differences were more likely in the incubating than non-incubating sex in ground-nesting species, but were equally likely regardless of incubation strategy in non-ground-nesting species. This result supports the olfactory crypsis hypothesis, if ground nesters are more vulnerable to olfactorily searching predators than non-ground nesters. Sex differences were more likely in species with uniparental than biparental incubation and during breeding than non-breeding, consistent with both the olfactory crypsis and sex semiochemical hypotheses. At present, the data do not allow us to disentangle these two hypotheses, but we provide recommendations that will enable researchers to do so.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12837DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preen oil
16
olfactory crypsis
16
sex differences
16
sex semiochemical
12
olfactory camouflage
8
differences
8
crypsis hypothesis
8
sex
8
differences preen
8
seasonal differences
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!