AI Article Synopsis

  • - Wheat and other gluten-containing grains are a major source of calories globally, leading to increased prevalence of celiac disease (CD), which was previously considered rare outside Europe; recent advancements have raised awareness and prompted better diagnosis strategies.
  • - The study aimed to analyze the latest scientific guidelines on CD by reviewing papers published from January 2010 to January 2021, identifying notable differences among guidelines from seven reputable scientific societies.
  • - Findings showed high concordance among guidelines but highlighted key differences in no-biopsy diagnosis options, HLA testing, and follow-up procedures, with significant changes, especially for children's diagnoses, anticipated in the near future.

Article Abstract

Background: Wheat and other gluten-containing grains are widely consumed, providing approximately 50% of the caloric intake in both industrialised and developing countries. The widespread diffusion of gluten-containing diets has rapidly led to a sharp increase in celiac disease prevalence. This condition was thought to be very rare outside Europe and relatively ignored by health professionals and the global media. However, in recent years, the discovery of important diagnostic and pathogenic milestones has led to the emergence of celiac disease (CD) from obscurity to global prominence. These modifications have prompted experts worldwide to identify effective strategies for the diagnosis and follow-up of CD. Different scientific societies, mainly from Europe and America, have proposed guidelines based on CD's most recent evidence.

Aim: To identify the most recent scientific guidelines on CD, aiming to find and critically analyse the main differences.

Methods: We performed a database search on PubMed selecting papers published between January 2010 and January 2021 in the English language. PubMed was lastly accessed on 1 March 2021.

Results: We distinguished guidelines from 7 different scientific societies whose reputation is worldwide recognized and representative of the clinical practice in different geographical regions. Differences were noted in the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis, HLA testing, follow-up protocols, and procedures.

Conclusion: We found a relatively high concordance between the guidelines for CD. Important modifications have occurred in the last years, especially about the possibility of a no-biopsy diagnosis in children. Other modifications are expected in the next future and will probably involve the extension of the non-invasive diagnosis to the adult population and the follow-up modalities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793016PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.154DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

celiac disease
12
scientific societies
8
possibility no-biopsy
8
no-biopsy diagnosis
8
current guidelines
4
guidelines management
4
management celiac
4
disease systematic
4
systematic review
4
review comparative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!