A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Recognition of uterine contractions with electrohysterogram and exploring the best electrode combination. | LitMetric

Recognition of uterine contractions with electrohysterogram and exploring the best electrode combination.

Technol Health Care

Beijing Yes Medical Devices Company Limited, Beijing, China.

Published: March 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the use of electrohysterogram (EHG) for long-term monitoring of uterine contractions (UC), which are crucial indicators during labor and delivery.
  • The researchers collected 112 EHG recordings and analyzed various features, using classifiers like decision tree, SVM, artificial neural network, and convolutional neural network to identify UCs.
  • The SVM classifier performed the best, with an optimal electrode arrangement on the uterine fundus and median axis, suggesting it could enhance clinical monitoring with fewer electrodes.

Article Abstract

Background: As an essential indicator of labour and delivery, uterine contraction (UC) can be detected by manual palpation, external tocodynamometry and internal uterine pressure catheter. However, these methods are not applicable for long-term monitoring.

Objective: This paper aims to recognize UCs with electrohysterogram (EHG) and find the best electrode combination with fewer electrodes.

Methods: 112 EHG recordings were collected by our bespoke device in our study. Thirteen features were extracted from EHG segments of UC and non-UC. Four classifiers of the decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network, and convolutional neural network were established to identify UCs. The optimal classifier among them was determined by comparing their classification results. The optimal classifier was applied to evaluate all the possible electrode combinations with one to eight electrodes.

Results: The results showed that SVM achieved the best classification capability. With SVM, the combination of electrodes on the right part of the uterine fundus and around the uterine body's median axis achieved the overall best performance.

Conclusions: The optimal electrode combination with fewer electrodes was confirmed to improve the clinical application for long-term monitoring of UCs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9028645PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/THC-228022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrode combination
12
best electrode
8
combination fewer
8
neural network
8
optimal classifier
8
achieved best
8
recognition uterine
4
uterine contractions
4
contractions electrohysterogram
4
electrohysterogram exploring
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!