Purpose: To investigate a plasmid DNA nicking assay approach for isolating and quantifying the DNA-damaging effects of ultrahigh-dose-rate (ie, FLASH) irradiation relative to conventional dose-rate irradiation.
Methods And Materials: We constructed and irradiated phantoms containing plasmid DNA to nominal doses of 20 Gy and 30 Gy using 16 MeV electrons at conventional (0.167 Gy/s) and FLASH (46.6 Gy/s and 93.2 Gy/s) dose rates. We delivered conventional dose rates using a standard clinical Varian iX linear accelerator and FLASH dose rates (FDRs) using a modified Varian 21EX C-series linear accelerator. We ran the irradiated DNA and controls (0 Gy) through an agarose gel electrophoresis procedure that sorted and localized the DNA into bands associated with single strand breaks (SSBs), double strand breaks (DSBs), and undamaged DNA. We quantitatively analyzed the gel images to compute the relative yields of SSBs and DSBs and applied a mathematical model of plasmid DNA damage as a function of dose to compute the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of SSB and DSB (RBE and RBE) damage for a given endpoint and FDR.
Results: Both RBE and RBE were less than unity with the FDR irradiations, indicating FLASH sparing. With regard to the more deleterious DNA DSB damage, the DSB RBEs of FLASH beams at dose rates of 46.6 Gy/s and 93.2 Gy/s relative to the conventional 16 MeV beam dose rate were 0.54 ± 0.15 and 0.55 ± 0.17, respectively.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility of using a DNA-based phantom to isolate and assess the FLASH sparing effect on DNA. We also found that FLASH irradiation causes less damage to DNA compared with a conventional dose rate. This result supports the notion that the protective effect of FLASH irradiation occurs at least partially via fundamental biochemical processes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.049 | DOI Listing |
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
January 2025
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic address:
Purpose: Proton FLASH has been investigated using cyclotron and synchrocyclotron beamlines but not synchrotron beamlines. We evaluated the impact of dose rate (ultra-high [UHDR] vs. conventional [CONV]) and beam configuration (shoot-through [ST] vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Sci
January 2025
Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Application, TIFPA, 38123 Povo, Italy.
Among the most investigated hypotheses for a radiobiological explanation of the mechanism behind the FLASH effect in ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy, intertrack recombination between particle tracks arriving at a close spatiotemporal distance has been suggested. In the present work, we examine these conditions for different beam qualities and energies, defining the limits of both space and time where a non-negligible chemical effect is expected. To this purpose the TRAX-CHEM chemical track structure Monte Carlo code has been extended to handle several particle tracks at the same time, separated by pre-defined spatial and temporal distances.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
January 2025
Intense Laser Irradiation Laboratory, National Institute of Optics, National Research Council of Italy, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
The use of very high energy electron (VHEE) beams, with energies between 50 and 400 MeV, has drawn considerable interest in radiotherapy due to their deep tissue penetration, sharp beam edges, and low sensitivity to tissue density. VHEE beams can be precisely steered with magnetic components, positioning VHEE therapy as a cost-effective option between photon and proton therapies. However, the clinical implementation of VHEE therapy (VHEET) requires advances in several areas: developing compact, stable, and efficient accelerators; creating sophisticated treatment planning software; and establishing clinically validated protocols.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNanomaterials (Basel)
January 2025
Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada.
Monte Carlo (MC) simulations have become important in advancing nanoparticle (NP)-based applications for cancer imaging and therapy. This review explores the critical role of MC simulations in modeling complex biological interactions, optimizing NP designs, and enhancing the precision of therapeutic and diagnostic strategies. Key findings highlight the ability of MC simulations to predict NP bio-distribution, radiation dosimetry, and treatment efficacy, providing a robust framework for addressing the stochastic nature of biological systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
January 2025
National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address:
This white paper examines the potential of pioneering technologies and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions in advancing clinical trials involving radiotherapy. As the field of radiotherapy evolves, the integration of cutting-edge approaches such as radiopharmaceutical dosimetry, FLASH radiotherapy, image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), and AI promises to improve treatment planning, patient care, and outcomes. Additionally, recent advancements in quantum science, linear energy transfer/relative biological effect (LET/RBE), and the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy create new avenues for innovation in clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!