Background: To ascertain the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity from existing evidence via conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials between biosimilar and originator insulins.
Methods: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrails.gov were searched to identify head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compare the efficacy and safety of biosimilar insulin and its originator. Efficacy was assessed by change of HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)), and change all mean of 7 points- or 8 points- SMBG. Safety was assessed by change in proportion hypoglycemia and serious hypoglycemia. The occurrence of anti-insulin antibodies (AIAs) was also evaluated.
Results: Fourteen RCTs with 6188 patients from different countries were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and were expressed as the mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). In efficacy, Insulin biosimilar products showed similar in change of HbA1C at weeks 26 and 52, the MD were 0.03 (95% CI - 0.02 to 0.07, p = 0.28), and 0.05 (95% CI - 0.05 to 0.15, p = 0.36), respectively. The proportion of HbA1C less than 7% at endpoint, the OR were 1.04 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.20, p = 0.64). The change of fasting plasma glucose (laboratory or SMBG) mmol/L in 24-52 weeks and change all mean of 7 points-/8 points- SMBG mmol/L in 24-52 weeks, the MD were 0.02 (95% CI - 0.20 to 0.24, p = 0.87) and - 0.34 (95% CI - 1.35 to 0.67, p = 0.51), respectively. In occurrence of hypoglycemia (≥ 1 events) and severe hypoglycemia, the OR were 0.96 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.09, p = 0.52) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.31, p = 0.62). The AIA was 1.02 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.16, p = 0.76). Analysis stratified by type of diabetes and duration of insulin. There was no significant difference between the biosimilar and their reference group in a different type of diabetes and different duration of insulin.
Conclusions: Insulin biosimilar showed comparable characteristics with the reference drug in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, through comprehensive and specific conventional meta-analysis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8817566 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00944-5 | DOI Listing |
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev
January 2025
BGL, BioGenomics Ltd, Maharashtra, India.
Insulin aspart, a rapid-acting analog, achieves faster subcutaneous absorption than regular insulin. This study aimed to demonstrate equivalence in the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of Recombinant Human Insulin Aspart from BioGenomics Limited (as test) and Novo-Nordisk (as reference) in healthy adult males. This was a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study, assessing PK and PD parameters under fasting conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Pharmacol Drug Dev
January 2025
R&D Center, GEROPHARM, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Ultra-rapid insulin lispro is an innovative insulin analogue designed to achieve rapid onset and short duration of action, aimed at optimizing glycemic control in patients with diabetes. This was a double-blind, randomized, 2-period, crossover clamp study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), along with safety profiles, of a potential biosimilar ultra-rapid insulin lispro compared to the reference product in healthy White men. A total of 35 healthy volunteers completed hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp procedures across both study periods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
November 2024
Department of Pharmacology, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Diabetes mellitus represents a significant and growing global health challenge, with its prevalence steadily increasing. Insulin therapy remains a cornerstone of diabetes management. Since its discovery in 1921, insulin has undergone substantial advancements, evolving from crude animal extracts to highly refined recombinant formulations and biosimilars.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAAPS J
December 2024
Laboratory of Immunology, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Research Division-IV, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Characterizing and mitigating factors that impact product immunogenicity can aid in risk assessment and/or managing risk following manufacturing changes. For follow-on products that have the same indication, patient population, and active product ingredient, the residual immunogenicity risk resides predominantly on differences in product and process related impurities. Characterizing differences in innate immune modulating impurities (IIRMI), which could act as adjuvants by activating local antigen presenting cells (APCs), can inform the immunogenicity risk assessment potentially reducing the need for clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRes Pharm Sci
October 2024
BioGenomics Ltd, Maharastra, India.
Background And Purpose: To compare the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant insulin aspart 100 U/mL manufactured by BioGenomics Limited (BGL-ASP) with innovator NovoRapid in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (T2 DM).
Experimental Approach: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study in T2 DM patients, on premix human insulin therapy ± oral anti-diabetics. Besides self-monitored plasma glucose, fasting and post-prandial plasma glucose (FPG and PPG) were tested at baseline, week 12, and week 24.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!