Objective: To evaluate differences in perioperative clinical outcomes in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in primary versus replacement settings. Secondarily, we aimed to identify patient-related factors contributing to complications associated with AUS placement.
Materials And Methods: A review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed between 2010 and 2018 identifying males undergoing AUS implantation. Subjects were further subdivided into primary implantation or removal/replacement of AUS simultaneously via current procedural terminology codes 53445 and 53447, respectively. 30-Day postoperative outcomes were compared between cohorts using t-test and Fisher's exact test. The relationship between patient factors and complications was evaluated using logistic regression.
Results: A total of 1,892 patients were identified: 1,445 primary AUS placement and 447 AUS replacement procedures. Patients undergoing AUS replacement were statistically older than those undergoing primary implantation (71.4 vs 69.7 years, P < .001). AUS replacement procedures were associated with an increased rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) compared to primary procedures (1.3% vs 0.4%, P ¼ .042). There were no differences identified between cohorts for deep SSI, cardiopulmonary complications, reoperation, operative time, or length of stay. Logistic regression demonstrated that higher body mass index was found to be independent risk factors for any complications, and diabetes mellitus was associated with increased risk of AUS-related readmission.
Conclusion: Within the perioperative period, patients undergoing replacement AUS have an increased risk of superficial SSI compared to primary AUS implantation. These findings can assist with appropriate perioperative counseling of patients undergoing primary and replacement AUS implantations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612775 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21204 | DOI Listing |
Adv Sci (Weinh)
December 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Although left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an alternative to heart transplantation, their artificial surfaces often lead to serious thrombotic complications requiring high-risk device replacement. Coating blood-contacting surfaces with antithrombogenic endothelial cells is considered an effective strategy for preventing thrombus formation. However, this concept has not yet been successfully implemented in LVADs, as severe cell loss is to be expected, especially on the impeller surface with high prothrombogenic supraphysiological shear stress.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Urol
December 2024
Division of Urology, Divisao de Clinica Urologica, School of Medicine, Hospital das Clinicas da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Avenida Dr. Eneas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255-Room 710F. 7th Floor, Sao Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-000, Brazil.
Purpose: Urethral instrumentation (UI) in patients with an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) demands technical considerations and poses a risk of urethral erosion, leading to serious clinical and legal consequences. We conducted a national survey to evaluate the knowledge and experience of Brazilian urologists with UI in these patients.
Methods: This study used an electronic survey distributed to members of the Brazilian Society of Urology.
Arch Ital Urol Androl
October 2024
Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Independent Public Hospital of Prof. W. Orlowski, Warsaw.
Purpose: To evaluate transperineal reanastomosis (TRPA) combined with incontinence surgery as a complex treatment for recurring vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) after radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 8 patients who underwent TRPA for recurring VUAS. Detailed preoperative and follow up data were assessed.
World J Urol
December 2024
Neuro-Urology Unit, Department of Physical Medecine and Rehabilitation, Raymond Poincaré Hospital (APHP), UVSQ Paris, Saclay, UMR 1179, France.
Purpose: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the gold standard to treat stress urinary incontinence related to sphincter insufficiency in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). This study aims to assess the incidence of de novo neurogenic detrusor overactivity or low bladder compliance after AUS implantation in adult spinal cord injured patients.
Methods: Retrospective observational study, descriptive by analysis of the medical records of patients followed in a department of Neuro-Urology from January 01, 2003 to March 31, 2023.
Scand J Urol
December 2024
Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence post-radical prostatectomy and the complication burden with a focus on identifying potential risk factors for reoperation as well as determining the fate of revision surgeries.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing primary AUS (pAUS) and revision AUS (rAUS) implantation at a tertiary centre. Logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors for reoperation associated with non-mechanical failures.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!