A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

/ mutation might act as the predictor for chemotherapy response in lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous carcinoma patients. | LitMetric

Background: Chemotherapy is the preferred treatment in many types of cancer including lung cancer. However, most of patients resist chemotherapy resulting in disease progressive and recurrence. Titin () mutation is proved as a beneficial role in lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC), but the predictive role on chemotherapy resistance of lung cancer is still limited and discussable.

Methods: Clinical information and related somatic mutation profiles were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and analyzed by R-Studio using R-package. Overall survival (OS) curve and the association between gene mutation and clinical features were determined by GraphPad 6.0 software.

Results: Available data including 563 lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and 505 LUSC subjects were included in this study. Among all patients, 205 out of 563 LUAD and 326 out of 505 LUSC patients displayed gene mutation. When comparing the clinical features in -mutated patients to patients without mutation who received chemotherapy, the tumors were always located in the upper lung in LUAD patients with mutation and most of -mutated subjects were at low pathological stage, which was not observed in LUSC patients. However, patients with -mutation, particularly missense mutation, had a higher chemosensitivity and longer OS period than that patients without mutation in both LUAD and LUSC. Of note, LUAD and LUSC patients possessed favorable OS and better chemotherapy response benefiting from /tumor protein 53 (TP53) double mutation compared to and mutation alone, respectively. Additionally, / double mutation-initiated high rate of chemotherapy response were largely concentrated within LUAD and LUSC patients whose anatomic neoplasm subdivision were located in the upper lung.

Conclusions: Collectively, / co-mutation is possibly served as an effective predictor for OS and chemotherapy response in lung cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798240PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2568DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chemotherapy response
16
lusc patients
16
patients
12
lung cancer
12
patients mutation
12
luad lusc
12
mutation
11
chemotherapy
8
predictor chemotherapy
8
lung
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!