Why reuse spent adsorbents? The latest challenges and limitations.

Despite the abundance of published reviews over the last few years, the inconsistent data representation in regards to the use of adsorbents in each work, renders the task of comparing them challenging. Disposing the adsorbent may have adverse environmental impact, which should be mitigated through regeneration and reuse processes, such as desorption. This review discusses how the importance of desorption and regeneration equates that of the adsorption stage, and presents various regeneration methods as well as the influencing parameters, advantages, and disadvantages thereof. For the purposes of this work, the adsorbents have been categorized into four groups: (i) graphene, (ii) carbon nanotubes, (iii) activated carbon compounds and (iv) clays and polymer adsorbents as representatives in order to further study their desorption and regeneration abilities, using a variety of desorption media/eluants. The process conditions, such as pH, dose required, concentration, adsorption ability and the cost of the adsorbents were examined for further analysis. The recovery efficiency and ability to get reused through the desorption process was also evaluated. The highest adsorption capacity was observed for graphene-based adsorbents reaching between 108 and >480 mg/g, and for activated carbon materials ranging from 34 to >384 mg/g, whereas carbon nanotubes and polymer-based adsorbents indicated rather low and greatly varying adsorption capacities, between 1 and >138 mg/g and between 7 and >57 mg/g, respectively. Most of the reviewed cases appear to fit the pseudo-second order (PSO) kinetic model. These materials have demonstrated a removal effectiveness between 71% and 99%. Overall, all the aforementioned adsorbents share the advantage of being highly reusable.