Is transvaginal mesh procedure a potential measure for pelvic organ prolapse repair when performed by expert surgeons?

Objectives: The aim of this study was to verify the safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh by analyzing the 2-year follow-up data of patients performed by a surgeon with a high volume of procedures.

Methods: A total of 617 patients with pelvic organ prolapse underwent transvaginal mesh by a single surgeon. Complications and anatomical status of each patient were examined up to 24 months after surgery. Risk factors for the recurrence were also analyzed.

Results: Regarding complications, we experienced 10 patients (3.8%) of bladder injuries in anterior transvaginal mesh and eight (3.4%) in anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh. Massive blood loss was observed in four patients, but there was no case of blood transfusion. Mesh exposures were seen in seven patients (1.2%). A total of 100 patients (16.2%) had prolapse recurrence, defined as the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage ≥II. As to recurrences on the operated compartments, we observed five patients (2.0%) for anterior transvaginal mesh, three (6.5%) for posterior transvaginal mesh, five (7.4%) for combined transvaginal mesh, and 31 (14.2%) in anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh. Regarding Point C before operation in the anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh, the recurrence rates were more than 23% in patients with a Point C of 4 or more. Binominal regression analyses showed that higher body mass index, younger age, and higher stage of uterine prolapse were significant risk factors.

Conclusions: The transvaginal mesh surgery is safe when conducted by experts. However, the recurrence rate may exceed 20% for high-stage uterine prolapse even when conducted by experts.