Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) may improve image quality. However, its impact on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the prostate has yet to be assessed. Purpose To determine whether DLR can improve image quality of diffusion-weighted MRI at values ranging from 1000 sec/mm to 5000 sec/mm in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, images of the prostate obtained at DWI with a value of 0 sec/mm, DWI with a value of 1000 sec/mm (DWI), DWI with a value of 3000 sec/mm (DWI), and DWI with a value of 5000 sec/mm (DWI) from consecutive patients with biopsy-proven cancer from January to June 2020 were reconstructed with and without DLR. Image quality was assessed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) from region-of-interest analysis and qualitatively assessed using a five-point visual scoring system (1 [very poor] to 5 [excellent]) for each high--value DWI sequence with and without DLR. The SNR, CNR, and visual score for DWI with and without DLR were compared with the paired test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction, respectively. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) from DWI with and without DLR were also compared with the paired test with Bonferroni correction. Results A total of 60 patients (mean age, 67 years; age range, 49-79 years) were analyzed. DWI with DLR showed significantly higher SNRs and CNRs than DWI without DLR ( < .001); for example, with DWI the mean SNR was 38.7 ± 0.6 versus 17.8 ± 0.6, respectively ( < .001), and the mean CNR was 18.4 ± 5.6 versus 7.4 ± 5.6, respectively ( < .001). DWI with DLR also demonstrated higher qualitative image quality than DWI without DLR (mean score: 4.8 ± 0.4 vs 4.0 ± 0.7, respectively, with DWI [ = .001], 3.8 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 0.8 with DWI [ = .002], and 3.1 ± 0.8 vs 2.0 ± 0.9 with DWI [ < .001]). ADCs derived with and without DLR did not differ substantially ( > .99). Conclusion Deep learning reconstruction improves the image quality of diffusion-weighted MRI scans of prostate cancer with no impact on apparent diffusion coefficient quantitation with a 3.0-T MRI system. © RSNA, 2022 . See also the editorial by Turkbey in this issue.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.204097 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!