Background: High quality multidisciplinary care improves outcomes for rectal cancer (RC) but is not consistently provided. Our objective was to understand surgeons' barriers to RC care.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 surgeons from 10 Michigan hospitals. Reports of hospital performance were shared. Interview transcripts were dual coded; data were reduced into emergent themes; and disagreements were resolved by discussion.

Results: Barriers to high quality care included negative attitudes, (resistance to change; not taking responsibility) lack of training/experience, complex care coordination, and financial disincentives. Facilitators included providers' positive attitudes and relationships, training/experience, surgeon leadership (development of protocols), patient-level systems of care (patient navigator), and higher-level support (cancer center reviews quality data). Themes were incorporated into an explanatory framework, with patient, provider, and systems domains.

Conclusions: In this qualitative study of RC surgeons, we identified barriers to and facilitators of high-quality care. The framework developed will facilitate the design of quality improvement interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.01.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
8
qualitative study
8
high quality
8
care
6
barriers
4
barriers high-quality
4
high-quality rectal
4
cancer care
4
care qualitative
4
study background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!