Purpose: amplification has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (anti-EGFRabs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The purpose of the study was to validate the predictive impact of amplification in mCRC.
Patients And Methods: We analyzed patients with wild-type mCRC across two distinct cohorts. In cohort 1 (n = 98), amplification was tested in tumor tissue using dual in situ hybridization ( amplification: ratio, 2.0 or greater). Cohort 2 (n = 70) included 16 patients with amplification and 54 nonamplified controls identified by next-generation sequencing ( amplification: four or more copies) who had received prior anti-EGFRabs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with anti-EGFRab therapy, which was estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.
Results: Median PFS in cohort 1 on anti-EGFRab-based therapy was significantly shorter in patients with amplification compared with nonamplified patients (2.8 8.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 7.05; 95% CI, 3.4 to 14.9; < .001). These findings were validated in cohort 2 (median PFS for amplified nonamplified: 2.8 9.3 months, respectively; HR, 10.66; 95% CI, 4.5 to 25.1; < .001). The median PFS on therapy without anti-EGFRabs was similar among -amplified and nonamplified patients in both cohort 1 (9.7 11.1 months, respectively; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4; = .97) and cohort 2 (9.6 11.3 months, respectively; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1; = .66). In multivariable analyses, amplification emerged as a single independent predictor of poor PFS on anti-EGFRab therapy in both cohort 1 (HR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; < .001) and cohort 2 (HR, 10.1; 95% CI, 4.3 to 23.9; < .001).
Conclusion: amplification in wild-type mCRC seems to be a predictive biomarker for lack of efficacy of anti-EGFRab therapy. Screening patients with wild-type mCRC for amplification should be considered before anti-EGFRab treatment to guide therapy and to identify patients for early referral to clinical trials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00226 | DOI Listing |
Adv Ther
January 2025
Centre of Cancer Medicine and University Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Introduction: Randomized phase III trials showed that using trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) conferred survival benefit versus placebo. Here, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of FTD/TPI and sought to identify prognostic factors among the mCRC population in Hong Kong.
Methods: A non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter cohort study enrolled patients with mCRC who received FTD/TPI in seven public hospitals in Hong Kong between 2016 and 2020.
Am J Cancer Res
December 2024
Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine Taipei 10051, Taiwan.
The combination of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and doublet chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for patients with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Some patients may require secondary resection after first-line treatment. However, it remains unclear whether targeted therapy should be continued after liver resection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Cancer Res
December 2024
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
This multicenter study explored the survival benefits of upfront primary tumor resection (PTR) followed by first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy in real-world patients with wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment options for mCRC include chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. The efficacy of upfront PTR in managing mCRC remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEClinicalMedicine
January 2025
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Berlin, Germany.
Background: The PanaMa trial aimed to compare the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) ± panitumumab maintenance in untreated wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.
Methods: In this final phase 2 trial analysis, adult mCRC patients responding to six cycles of FU/FA, oxaliplatin and panitumumab were randomized (1:1, open-label) to maintenance of either FU/FA + panitumumab or FU/FA alone. The primary endpoint was superiority of progression-free survival of maintenance (PFS; time from random assignment to progression/death) in favour of FU/FA + panitumumab.
Clin Colorectal Cancer
December 2024
Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Background: Panitumumab (pan) plus chemotherapy is a preferred first-line therapy for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Older patients may not be suitable for combination regimens. We investigated 2 lower intensity pan-containing regimens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!