It is widely believed that feedback improves behavior, but the mechanisms behind this improvement remain unclear. Different theories postulate that feedback has either a direct effect on performance through automatic reinforcement mechanisms or only an indirect effect mediated by a deliberate change in strategy. To adjudicate between these competing accounts, we performed two large experiments on human adults (total = 518); approximately half the participants received trial-by-trial feedback on a perceptual task, whereas the other half did not receive any feedback. We found that feedback had no effect on either perceptual or metacognitive sensitivity even after 7 days of training. On the other hand, feedback significantly affected participants' response strategies by reducing response bias and improving confidence calibration. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of feedback stem from allowing people to adjust their strategies for performing the task and not from direct reinforcement mechanisms, at least in the domain of perception.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096460PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09567976211032887DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

feedback perceptual
12
reinforcement mechanisms
8
feedback
7
impact feedback
4
perceptual decision-making
4
decision-making metacognition
4
metacognition reduction
4
reduction bias
4
bias change
4
change sensitivity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!