The treatment of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye has been revolutionized by the development of sustained-release corticosteroid implants over the past decade. Their use is now supported by healthcare systems that have licensed and commissioned them on the basis of the high-quality randomised controlled trials that formed part of their development and which have informed clinicians as to their benefits and risks. In particular, they have provided an alternative mode of treatment for patients who do not wish to be systemically immunosuppressed, or in whom such immunosuppression is less desirable, such as those with unilateral disease or those with concurrent illnesses such as diabetes mellitus, renal disease or osteoporosis that are negatively impacted by systemic corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents. In this article, we review the evidence for the use of the major licensed corticosteroid implants and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800436PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00456-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-infectious uveitis
8
uveitis posterior
8
posterior segment
8
segment eye
8
corticosteroid implants
8
sustained release
4
release intravitreal
4
intravitreal steroid
4
steroid implants
4
implants non-infectious
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!