Background: Remote monitoring-enabled insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are useful tools for arrhythmias and symptom management. This study sought to evaluate the outcome of ICM implantation in a large, heterogeneous cohort of pediatric and young adult patients.

Methods: Single centre, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ICM implantation in 2010-2019. Patients were analysed according to age, symptoms, arrhythmias and underlying heart disease.

Results: A total of 200 consecutive patients (58% male), aged 11.5 ± 5.8 years at ICM implantation, were included. Follow-up was 31 ± 18 months. Electrophysiologic study (EPS) was initially performed in 123 patients and was negative in 85%. Patients had no heart disease (57.5%), congenital heart defects (21%), channelopathies (14.5%), cardiomyopathies/heart tumors (8%). The commonest symptoms were syncope/presyncope (45.5%) and palpitations (12.5%). A definite diagnosis was made in 63% of patients (positive diagnosis in 25%, negative in 38%) after 8 (2-19) months of monitoring. EPS results and the presence/absence of an arrhythmia before ICM implantation had no impact on the diagnostic yield. Symptomatic patients as well as patients without structural heart disease showed higher diagnostic yield. Patients with a positive diagnosis underwent pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (13%), pharmacological treatment (10.5%), or catheter ablation (1.5%).

Conclusions: In a large cohort of 200 children and young adults, ICMs with remote monitoring showed a high diagnostic yield (63%), especially in symptomatic patients and in patients without structural heart disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

icm implantation
16
patients
12
heart disease
12
diagnostic yield
12
insertable cardiac
8
cardiac monitors
8
remote monitoring
8
patients positive
8
positive diagnosis
8
symptomatic patients
8

Similar Publications

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has a significant impact on health and quality of life. The relationship of AF burden and temporal patterns of AF on patient symptoms, outcomes, and healthcare utilization is unknown. Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are a strategic and as yet untapped, tool to investigate these relationships.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To evaluate the predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic parameters for occurrence of VAs in patients with preexisting ICD undergoing LVAD implantation.

Methods And Results: All consecutive patients (n = 264) with previous ICD who underwent LVAD surgery between May 2011 and December 2019 at our institution were included. The patients were predominantly male (89%) with NICM (59%) and a mean age of 59 ± 10 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: We aim to evaluate the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in a large real-world cohort of patients implanted with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) who had a clinical history of symptomatic heart failure (HF) with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods: Patients with an ICM and a history of HF events were identified from the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset merged with an ICM device dataset collected during 2007-2021. All ICM-detected AF episodes that were available with ≥30-s of ECG at onset were adjudicated using artificial intelligence (AI model).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Bilateral CSD (BCSD) shows an approximate 60% reduction in implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks and over 50% one-year survival without shock or transplant, while the 2017 guidelines endorse the left CSD for specific RVT types.
  • * Despite the promising results, many studies have small sample sizes leading to potential underreporting of complications; more research is needed to fully understand the long
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The impact of prior unsuccessful debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedures on subsequent revisions is uncertain, with conflicting evidence. Despite 85% consensus against the second DAIR procedure following the 2018 International Consensus Meeting, a 2020 study reported high success rates for the aforementioned second DAIR procedure. We conducted a multicenter observational study reviewing data from patients with failed DAIR procedures between 2005 and 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!