A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Amide proton transfer and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI differentiates between growing and non-growing intracranial meningiomas: a pilot study. | LitMetric

Amide proton transfer and chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI differentiates between growing and non-growing intracranial meningiomas: a pilot study.

Clin Radiol

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.

Published: April 2022

Aim: To differentiate between growing and non-growing intracranial meningiomas using magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR) values with amide proton transfer (APT) and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials And Methods: Seventeen patients with suspected intracranial meningiomas who underwent APT-CEST MRI from November 2020 to April 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. MTR values on APT-CEST imaging as well as conventional MRI features were evaluated. These parameters were compared in growing meningiomas versus non-growing meningiomas and the findings compared with previous MRI examinations. ROC curve analysis was also performed to determine the diagnostic cut-offs for MTR.

Results: The cohort comprised 10 patients with growing meningiomas (two men [20%], eight women [80%]; mean age [standard deviation (SD)]: 59.9 years [16]) and seven patients with non-growing meningiomas (seven women [100%]; mean age [SD]: 63.9 years [18.6]). Significant differences were found in MTR values (0.0198 ± 0.0003 versus 0.0131 ± 0.0002; p<0.0001) between the growing meningiomas and non-growing meningiomas groups, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that MTR values clearly differentiated between growing and non-growing meningiomas. At an area under the ROC curve (AUC) threshold of 0.0151, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for MTR were 100%, 85.7%, 90.9%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion: Patients with growing meningiomas could be discriminated from patients with non-growing meningiomas, using the MTR values on post-growth tumour APT-CEST imaging.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2021.12.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intracranial meningiomas
12
mtr values
12
amide proton
8
proton transfer
8
chemical exchange
8
exchange saturation
8
saturation transfer
8
growing non-growing
8
non-growing intracranial
8
growing meningiomas
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!