The uropathogens is the main cause of urinary tract infection (UTI). The aim of the study was to isolate bacteria from urine samples of UTI patients and find out the susceptibility of isolated bacteria. Bacteria were identified using both conventional and molecular methods. Sanger sequence procedure used for 16S ribosomal RNA and phylogenetic analysis was performed using Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA-7) software. In this study, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Staphylococcus were reported as 58, 28 and 14.0% respectively. Phylogenetic tree revealed that 99% of sample No. Ai (05) is closely related to E. coli to (NR 114042.1 E. coli strain NBRC 102203). Aii (23) is 99% similar to K. pneumoniae to (NR 117686.1 K. pneumonia strain DSM 30104) and 90% Bi (48) is closely linked to S. aureus to (NR 113956.1 S. aureus strain NBRC 100910). The antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli recorded highest resistance towards ampicillin (90%) and least resistant to ofloxacin (14%). Some of the other antibiotics such amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, cefuroxime and nitrofurantoin resistance were observed 86, 62, 24, 55, 48 and 35% respectively. The cefuroxime showed the highest antibiotic resistance against K. pneumoniae with 85% followed by amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, ceftazidime, ampicillin and nitrofurantoin resulted in 60, 45, 67, 70, 75 and 30% respectively. The resistance of S. aureus against erythromycin, cefuroxime and ampicillin were found with 72%. The resistance against amoxicillin, gentamicin, ceftazidime and ceftriaxone found 57, 43, 43 and 15% respectively. Phylogenetic analysis shows that sequences are closely related with the reference sequences and E. coli is the dominant bacteria among UTI patients and is resistant to the commercially available antibiotics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797202 | PMC |
| http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262952 | PLOS |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Computational Methods for Lineage Reconstruction.
Methods Mol Biol
January 2025
Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico, Barcelona, Spain.
The recent development of genetic lineage recorders, designed to register the genealogical history of cells using induced somatic mutations, has opened the possibility of reconstructing complete animal cell lineages. To reconstruct a cell lineage tree from a molecular recorder, it is crucial to use an appropriate reconstruction algorithm. Current approaches include algorithms specifically designed for cell lineage reconstruction and the repurposing of phylogenetic algorithms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBacktracking Cell Phylogenies in the Human Brain with Somatic Mosaic Variants.
Methods Mol Biol
January 2025
Sorbonne Université, Institut du Cerveau (Paris Brain Institute) ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Somatic mosaic variants, and especially somatic single nucleotide variants (sSNVs), occur in progenitor cells in the developing human brain frequently enough to provide permanent, unique, and cumulative markers of cell divisions and clones. Here, we describe an experimental workflow to perform lineage studies in the human brain using somatic variants. The workflow consists in two major steps: (1) sSNV calling through whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of bulk (non-single-cell) DNA extracted from human fresh-frozen tissue biopsies, and (2) sSNV validation and cell phylogeny deciphering through single nuclei whole-genome amplification (WGA) followed by targeted sequencing of sSNV loci.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReconstructing Progenitor State Hierarchy and Dynamics Using Lineage Barcoding Data.
Methods Mol Biol
January 2025
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Measurements of cell phylogeny based on natural or induced mutations, known as lineage barcodes, in conjunction with molecular phenotype have become increasingly feasible for a large number of single cells. In this chapter, we delve into Quantitative Fate Mapping (QFM) and its computational pipeline, which enables the interrogation of the dynamics of progenitor cells and their fate restriction during development. The methods described here include inferring cell phylogeny with the Phylotime model, and reconstructing progenitor state hierarchy, commitment time, population size, and commitment bias with the ICE-FASE algorithm.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBayesian Phylogenetic Lineage Reconstruction with Loss of Heterozygosity Mutations Derived from Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.
Methods Mol Biol
January 2025
Allen Discovery Center for Lineage Tracing and Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mutations are acquired frequently, such t`hat each cell's genome inscribes its history of cell divisions. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) accumulates throughout the genome, offering large encoding capacity for phylogenetic inference of cell lineage.In this chapter, we demonstrate a method, using single-cell RNA sequencing, for reconstructing cell lineages from inferred LOH events in a Bayesian manner, annotating the lineage with cell phenotypes, and marking developmental time points based on X-chromosome inactivation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMetagenome-assembled genome of from urban bats in China.
Microbiol Resour Announc
December 2024
China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing, China.
We conducted metagenomic sequencing on a stool sample collected from urban-dwelling and obtained a metagenome-assembled genome of . Phylogenetic analysis revealed that this strain is closely related to the one isolated from dogs, forming a distinct clade separate from the reference genome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!