Aim: To synthesize qualitative evidence of premenopausal women's experiences of fertility decision-making with a diagnosis of breast cancer.
Background: Breast cancer is increasingly more common in premenopausal women who may have not yet considered starting a family or have completed their families.
Design: Qualitative evidence synthesis guided by Thomas and Harden's three-stage approach to thematic analysis.
Data Sources: Twelve electronic databases were searched: CINAHL, Embase, Pubmed, Proquest, PsychINFO, Lenus, Scopus, Web of Science, Rian.ie, Medline, EThOS e-theses online and DART Europe. No year limit was set.
Review Methods: The 'Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research guidelines' (ENTREQ) statement was followed.
Results: Fifteen qualitative studies were included in the synthesis. Seven review findings under four major themes were identified: (1) first comes survival, (2) making decisions 'under the gun', (3) health-care professionals should not make assumptions and (4) we want accurate, detailed information and we want it early. High confidence in six of the review findings was agreed.
Conclusion: Most women experienced rushed fertility preservation decision-making at a time when they also faced cancer treatment decisions. Women want detailed, clear information on fertility preservation early after their diagnosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13036 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!