Aim: To synthesize qualitative evidence of premenopausal women's experiences of fertility decision-making with a diagnosis of breast cancer.

Background: Breast cancer is increasingly more common in premenopausal women who may have not yet considered starting a family or have completed their families.

Design: Qualitative evidence synthesis guided by Thomas and Harden's three-stage approach to thematic analysis.

Data Sources: Twelve electronic databases were searched: CINAHL, Embase, Pubmed, Proquest, PsychINFO, Lenus, Scopus, Web of Science, Rian.ie, Medline, EThOS e-theses online and DART Europe. No year limit was set.

Review Methods: The 'Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research guidelines' (ENTREQ) statement was followed.

Results: Fifteen qualitative studies were included in the synthesis. Seven review findings under four major themes were identified: (1) first comes survival, (2) making decisions 'under the gun', (3) health-care professionals should not make assumptions and (4) we want accurate, detailed information and we want it early. High confidence in six of the review findings was agreed.

Conclusion: Most women experienced rushed fertility preservation decision-making at a time when they also faced cancer treatment decisions. Women want detailed, clear information on fertility preservation early after their diagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qualitative evidence
12
fertility decision-making
8
decision-making diagnosis
8
diagnosis breast
8
breast cancer
8
evidence synthesis
8
review findings
8
fertility preservation
8
qualitative
5
women's fertility
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!