Results: There were no significant differences between the cRY group and pRY group regarding age, sex, BMI, neoadjuvant therapy, preoperative comorbidities, history of laparotomy, ASA score, tumor location, pathological stage, total operative time, incision length, blood loss, time-to-first flatus, time-to-first soft diet, and postoperative hospital stays. The proportions of patients who received a 21 mm stapler were higher in the cRY group (7/44) than that in the pRY group (0/68) ( = 0.003). 7 anastomotic complications were reported (6 in the cRY group versus 1 in pRY group; = 0.028) of which five (83.3%) in the cRY were anastomotic stenosis versus none in the pRY group ( = 0.044).

Conclusions: The application of pant-shaped anastomosis for esophagojejunostomy after LTG is a safe and feasible procedure and has an advantage when the jejunum diameter is small.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789474PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4494401DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pry group
16
cry group
12
versus pry
8
group
7
modified anastomosis
4
anastomosis technique
4
technique esophagojejunostomy
4
esophagojejunostomy laparoscopy-assisted
4
laparoscopy-assisted total
4
total gastrectomy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!