Purpose: The purpose is to compare the predictive utility of alternate measures of diet and physical activity for overweight and obesity among low-income minority women.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a cohort study.
Setting: Three public housing developments in South Los Angeles.Subjects: Adult women (N = 425).
Measures: Primary outcome-weight status (normal BMI, overweight, or obese). Primary predictors- diet: 24-hour dietary recalls (Healthy Eating Index), dietary screener (intake of specific food groups), and single-item survey question (diet quality); physical activity: accelerometry (minutes/day of moderate-to-vigorous activity), short recall questionnaire (minutes/week of moderate and vigorous activity), and single-item questions (days per week did exercise; self-assessment of overall activity level).
Analysis: Multinomial logistic regression models, controlling for socio-demographic covariates. Models are built up starting with least resource-intensive measures of diet and physical activity (single items) and sequentially adding more resource-intensive measures. Model performance is assessed via information-based model selection indices.
Results: Adjusted relative risk for obesity for single-item measures ranged from .61 to .64 for diet ( < .01) and from .80 to .81 for physical activity (P <.05). The added value of resource-intensive measures was negligible for physical activity and at best small for diet.
Conclusion: Single-item questions for diet and physical activity can provide valuable information about risk for overweight and obesity in low-income minority women when more resource-intensive assessments are infeasible.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9086088 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08901171211069992 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!