A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Training Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellows in Thoracentesis Using a Head-Mounted Video Camera. | LitMetric

Background: Determination of competence to perform procedures during pulmonary critical care medicine fellowship training has traditionally been based on subjective faculty opinion and numerical requirements.

Objective: To describe an objective means of assessing competence of fellows to perform thoracentesis using a head-mounted video camera with offline scoring of the thoracentesis performed on an actual patient.

Methods: To test competence in performance of thoracentesis after a multimodality training program, a total of eight first-year fellows performed a thoracentesis on an actual patient while recording the procedure with a lightweight head-mounted video camera in 2017 and 2018. The recordings were scored offline by two faculty members using a 30-point checklist. The percentage agreement between scorers was measured, as was the opinion of the fellows and the scorers on the testing process. If a fellow failed completion of all checklist items, they were provided with further training and retested to assure competence. As part of their training, fellows reviewed the video record of their procedures.

Results: Eight first-year fellows were tested, of whom seven successfully completed key checklist items as determined by the video scorers. One failing fellow passed after further training and testing. The percentage agreement between the scorers was high, and fellows indicated that the video device was useful for training.

Conclusion: This study supports the use of video-based testing for assessment of competence and for training in performance of thoracentesis by fellows.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8749010PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0052INDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

head-mounted video
12
video camera
12
pulmonary critical
8
critical care
8
care medicine
8
fellows
8
thoracentesis head-mounted
8
performance thoracentesis
8
first-year fellows
8
percentage agreement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!