Aim: To present an image-processing measurement algorithm to evaluate the transfer accuracy of indirect bonding (IDB) trays, exemplified by a CAD/CAM-based IDB tray integrated into a digital orthodontic workflow.

Materials And Methods: Plaster casts of 24 patients with full dentition and different malocclusions were scanned with an intraoral scanner (Trios; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to obtain digital models, which served for the virtual placement of orthodontic brackets in simulation software (OnyxCeph; Image Instruments, Chemnitz, Germany). The resulting STL files were sent to a dental laboratory (CA Digital; Hilden, Germany) for the production of INDIVIDUA IDB trays. These trays were used to transfer the brackets to the respective plaster casts. Finally, a second scan was performed to record the actual bracket positions. The transfer accuracy was then analyzed by a measurement algorithm scripted to automation, which calculated the deviations of the planned and real bracket positions with a local best-fit alignment, resulting in three linear and three angular measurements for each bracket.

Results: In total, 622 brackets and tubes were transferred successfully. The presented algorithm analyzed the transfer accuracy and demonstrated that the linear measurements were 98.3% within the range of the American Board of Orthodontics standard. The angular measurements were 86.7% within this range when the INDIVIDUA IDB tray was used.

Conclusion: Scripted measurement algorithms facilitated the evaluation of present and future materials and designs for IDB trays to obtain an efficient solution for orthodontic practice. The INDIVIDUA IDB tray is a digital alternative to conventional IDB trays (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(3):295-302; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599775).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599775DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

idb trays
16
measurement algorithm
12
transfer accuracy
12
idb tray
12
individua idb
12
accuracy indirect
8
indirect bonding
8
plaster casts
8
bracket positions
8
angular measurements
8

Similar Publications

Potential for bracket bonding errors based on tray accuracy and fit: Evaluation of 6 photopolymer resins for indirect bonding trays.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

December 2024

Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; Institute for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study examined the accuracy and fit of 3D-printed indirect bonding trays made from different photopolymer resin materials, using a maxillary plaster model and replicas for testing.
  • Six types of trays were printed, revealing significant linear transfer errors, mainly in the vertical direction, with specific resins showing varying levels of precision.
  • The findings highlighted that linear errors are more influenced by the material used than angular errors, indicating the need for designs tailored to the specific resins to enhance the fit and alignment of brackets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the transfer accuracy of two different indirect bonding (IDB) trays.

Materials And Methods: Digital IDB was performed on a total of 30 patients using one of two designs: shell and bar trays, with 15 patients in each group. Trays were designed with the Appliance Designer software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Recent developments in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing have enabled the fabrication of digital indirect bonding (IDB) transfer trays. These modern products require thorough investigation.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece IDB transfer trays in vitro.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate and compare transfer accuracy between a Polyjet printed indirect bonding (IDB) tray (SureSmile, Dentsply Sirona, Richardson, TX, USA) and a conventional two-layered silicone tray.

Materials And Methods: Plaster models of 24 patients were digitized with an intraoral scanner, and brackets and tubes were positioned virtually on the provider's homepage. IDB trays were designed over the planned attachments and Polyjet 3D-printed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed bracket transfer tray using an in-office indirect bonding system.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

July 2022

Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address:

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the bracket positioning accuracy of the indirect bonding (IDB) transfer tray fabricated in-clinic using the tray printing (TP) and marker-model printing methods (MP).

Methods: The TP group was further divided into 2 groups (single-tray printing [STP] and multiple-tray printing [MTP]) depending on the presence of a tray split created using the 3-dimensional (3D) software. Five duplicated plaster models were used for each of the 3 experimental groups, and a total of 180 artificial teeth, except the second molar, were evaluated in the experiment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!