Aim: To present an image-processing measurement algorithm to evaluate the transfer accuracy of indirect bonding (IDB) trays, exemplified by a CAD/CAM-based IDB tray integrated into a digital orthodontic workflow.
Materials And Methods: Plaster casts of 24 patients with full dentition and different malocclusions were scanned with an intraoral scanner (Trios; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to obtain digital models, which served for the virtual placement of orthodontic brackets in simulation software (OnyxCeph; Image Instruments, Chemnitz, Germany). The resulting STL files were sent to a dental laboratory (CA Digital; Hilden, Germany) for the production of INDIVIDUA IDB trays. These trays were used to transfer the brackets to the respective plaster casts. Finally, a second scan was performed to record the actual bracket positions. The transfer accuracy was then analyzed by a measurement algorithm scripted to automation, which calculated the deviations of the planned and real bracket positions with a local best-fit alignment, resulting in three linear and three angular measurements for each bracket.
Results: In total, 622 brackets and tubes were transferred successfully. The presented algorithm analyzed the transfer accuracy and demonstrated that the linear measurements were 98.3% within the range of the American Board of Orthodontics standard. The angular measurements were 86.7% within this range when the INDIVIDUA IDB tray was used.
Conclusion: Scripted measurement algorithms facilitated the evaluation of present and future materials and designs for IDB trays to obtain an efficient solution for orthodontic practice. The INDIVIDUA IDB tray is a digital alternative to conventional IDB trays (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(3):295-302; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599775).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599775 | DOI Listing |
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
December 2024
Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; Institute for Innovation in Digital Healthcare, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address:
Objectives: To compare the transfer accuracy of two different indirect bonding (IDB) trays.
Materials And Methods: Digital IDB was performed on a total of 30 patients using one of two designs: shell and bar trays, with 15 patients in each group. Trays were designed with the Appliance Designer software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Dent Med Probl
December 2024
Department of Maxillofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.
Background: Recent developments in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing have enabled the fabrication of digital indirect bonding (IDB) transfer trays. These modern products require thorough investigation.
Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece IDB transfer trays in vitro.
Objectives: To investigate and compare transfer accuracy between a Polyjet printed indirect bonding (IDB) tray (SureSmile, Dentsply Sirona, Richardson, TX, USA) and a conventional two-layered silicone tray.
Materials And Methods: Plaster models of 24 patients were digitized with an intraoral scanner, and brackets and tubes were positioned virtually on the provider's homepage. IDB trays were designed over the planned attachments and Polyjet 3D-printed.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
July 2022
Department of Orthodontics, The Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address:
Introduction: In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the bracket positioning accuracy of the indirect bonding (IDB) transfer tray fabricated in-clinic using the tray printing (TP) and marker-model printing methods (MP).
Methods: The TP group was further divided into 2 groups (single-tray printing [STP] and multiple-tray printing [MTP]) depending on the presence of a tray split created using the 3-dimensional (3D) software. Five duplicated plaster models were used for each of the 3 experimental groups, and a total of 180 artificial teeth, except the second molar, were evaluated in the experiment.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!