Introduction Posterior cervical foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are the mainstay treatments for cervical radiculopathy. A recent alternative or adjunct involves the placement of interfacet spacers, which promote indirect decompression by increasing foraminal height. Cervical interfacet spacers have been shown to be safe options for indirect decompression and improve short-term clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spine pathologies. However, no previous data regarding malpositioned spacers and their management have been reported. Given this paucity of data, we aim to present examples of malpositioned interfacet spacers and their management. Methods This was a retrospective single-center review. Results Twenty-five patients were identified in which interfacet spacers were used at a single level in 19 cases, two levels in five cases, and three levels in one case. The cohort had a mean follow-up of 14.4 months. Among 60 total spacers placed, two required repositioning (3.3%). The first underwent bilateral placement at C4/5 and developed a unilateral deltoid palsy postoperatively. She was taken back to the operating room the same day for implant removal. A second patient underwent removal after a malpositioned implant at C4/5 was identified on an intraoperative CT scan. A third patient had spacers placed at a referring hospital and presented with progressive neck pain and radiculopathy. She underwent successful removal with a resolution of her symptoms. Conclusions Interfacet spacers represent a novel technique for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, however, there are limited data on their utilization. We present the first reports of malpositioned spacers and their management. Patients with small facet joints and lateral masses may be at increased risk for malposition, and intraoperative fluoroscopy may not adequately confirm implant placement. Surgeons should use caution when implementing new technology with a low threshold for intraoperative CT to confirm the appropriate placement of these devices.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8763025 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20450 | DOI Listing |
J Surg Case Rep
September 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, LSUHSC New Orleans, 2021 Perdido Street, 8th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112, United States.
Standard posterior cervical fusion is a common surgical technique that utilizes lateral mass screws and rods for fixation. A relatively new, minimally invasive technique involving interfacet decortication and placement of spacers has shown promise in terms of outcomes. We sought to determine fusion rates and complications of this new technique at our institution to bolster current literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChilds Nerv Syst
July 2024
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed)
January 2024
Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA. Electronic address:
Neurosurgical management of basilar invagination (BI) has traditionally been aimed at direct cervicomedullary decompression through transoral dens resection or suboccipital decompression with supplemental instrumented fixation. Dr. Goel introduced chronic atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) as the etiology in most cases of BI and described a technique for distracting the C1-C2 joint with interfacet spacers to achieve reduction and anatomic realignment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
December 2021
Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Introduction Posterior cervical foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are the mainstay treatments for cervical radiculopathy. A recent alternative or adjunct involves the placement of interfacet spacers, which promote indirect decompression by increasing foraminal height. Cervical interfacet spacers have been shown to be safe options for indirect decompression and improve short-term clinical outcomes in patients with cervical spine pathologies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStudy Design: Biomechanics study.
Objectives: To evaluate the biomechanical advantage of interfacet allograft spacers in an unstable single-level and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) pseudoarthrosis model.
Methods: Nine single-level and 8 two-level ACDF constructs were tested.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!