“Schizophrenia” is used as a unitary diagnostic term for an illness that is extremely heterogeneous in its etiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and trajectory. Furthermore, the presence of psychosis—its hallmark characteristic—can be observed in individuals with other diagnoses, and biologically- and computationally-defined psychosis biotypes differ from those associated with DSM diagnoses and yield different treatment predictions. We argue that is not only stigmatizing as a label, it is not useful as a diagnostic term, a disease concept, or a construct for scientific research. Until we are able to delineate a range of dysfunctions across molecular/cellular and/or macrocircuit levels that map onto psychosis-proneness and indicate optimal treatment pathways, we propose to eliminate and replace it with a new nomenclature as an interim solution. Similar to what is done with other broad descriptive disease concepts in medicine which are defined by hallmark clinical features and then further subtyped (e.g., sickle cell anemia, iron deficiency anemia), we propose that psychosis spectrum illnesses (PSIs) be characterized by their temporal characteristics, relevant modifying/causal and symptom features, and treatment responsiveness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9809202 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2022.01.004 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!