Consumer demands and innovation have led to an increasingly diverse range of nicotine delivery systems, driven by a desire to reduce risk associated with traditional combustible cigarettes. This speed of change provides a mandate for rapid new product assessment. We have used the validated technology ToxTracker®, to assess biomarkers of DNA damage, protein misfolding, oxidative and cellular stress, across the categories of cigarette (1R6F), tobacco heating product (THP 1.4) and electronic cigarette (ePen 3). In addition, we compared the commonly used test matrices for tobacco and nicotine products; whole aerosol aqueous extracts (AqE) and gas vapour phase (GVP), determining their suitability across the product categories. We demonstrated a significant reduction in oxidative stress and cytotoxicity for THP 1.4 over cigarette, further reduced for ePen 3, when assessed by both dilution and nicotine dosimetry. We also identified that while the extraction matrices AqE and GVP from combustible products were equivalent in the induced responses, this was not true of the other category examples, moreover THP 1.4 GVP demonstrates a >50 % reduction in both toxicity and cytotoxicity endpoints over AqE. This indicates that unlike cigarette, the active components or toxicants for THP and electronic cigarette are associated with the aerosol fraction of these categories.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.01.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!