AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the cost effectiveness of oral semaglutide compared to other oral diabetes medications in Sweden.
  • Base-case analysis showed that while oral semaglutide had higher treatment costs, it resulted in lower complications and indirect costs due to better management of blood sugar levels.
  • The findings indicated that oral semaglutide is cost effective, with lower incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) compared to both empagliflozin and sitagliptin.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of oral semaglutide versus other oral glucose-lowering drugs for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Sweden.

Methods: The Swedish Institute for Health Economics Diabetes Cohort Model was used to assess the cost effectiveness of oral semaglutide 14 mg versus empagliflozin 25 mg and oral semaglutide 14 mg versus sitagliptin 100 mg, using data from the head-to-head PIONEER 2 and 3 trials, respectively, in which these treatments were added to metformin (± sulphonylurea). Base-case and scenario analyses were conducted. Robustness was evaluated with deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results: In the base-case analyses, greater initial lowering of glycated haemoglobin levels with oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin and oral semaglutide versus sitagliptin, respectively, resulted in reduced incidences of micro- and macrovascular complications and was associated with lower costs of complications and indirect costs. Treatment costs were higher for oral semaglutide, resulting in higher total lifetime costs than with empagliflozin (Swedish Krona [SEK] 1,245,570 vs. 1,210,172) and sitagliptin (SEK1,405,789 vs. 1,377,381). Oral semaglutide was shown to be cost effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SEK239,001 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) compared with empagliflozin and SEK120,848 per QALY compared with sitagliptin, from a payer perspective. ICERs were lower at SEK191,721 per QALY compared with empagliflozin and SEK95,234 per QALY compared with sitagliptin from a societal perspective. Results were similar in scenario analyses that incorporated cardiovascular effects, and also in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: In a Swedish setting, oral semaglutide was cost effective compared with empagliflozin and sitagliptin for patients with T2D inadequately controlled on oral glucose-lowering drugs.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02863328 (PIONEER 2; registered 11 August 2016) and NCT02607865 (PIONEER 3; registered 18 November 2015).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9043066PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-021-00317-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral semaglutide
36
semaglutide versus
24
qaly compared
16
cost effectiveness
12
effectiveness oral
12
versus empagliflozin
12
compared empagliflozin
12
oral
11
semaglutide
9
empagliflozin sitagliptin
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!