Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether EAT volume in combination with coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived plaque quantification and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has prognostic implication with major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Methods: Patients (n = 117, 58 ± 10 years, 61% male) who had previously undergone invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and CCTA were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up was performed to record MACE. EAT volume and plaque measures were derived from non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT images using a semi-automatic software approach, while CT-FFR was calculated using a machine-learning algorithm. The diagnostic performance to identify MACE was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis and concordance (C)-indices.
Results: During a median follow-up period of 40.4 months, 19 events were registered. EAT volume, CCTA ≥ 50% stenosis, and CT-FFR were significantly different in patients developing MACE (all p < 0.05). The following parameters were predictors of MACE in adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR]): EAT volume (HR 2.21, p = 0.023), indexed EAT volume (HR 2.03, p = 0.035), and CCTA ≥ 50% (HR 1.05, p = 0.048). A model including Morise score, CCTA ≥ 50% stenosis, and EAT volume showed significantly improved C-index to Morise score alone (AUC 0.83 vs. 0.66, p = 0.004).
Conclusions: Facing limitations in conventional cardiovascular risk scoring models, this observational study demonstrates that the prediction performance of our proposed method achieves a significant improvement in prognostic ability, especially when compared to models such as Morise score alone or its combination with CCTA and CT-FFR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110157 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!