Objective: To compare operative efficiency of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using both the standard multi-incisional approach and en-bloc enucleation with early apical release during the initial learning curve.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the initial 95 consecutive men who underwent HoLEP between April 2019 and September 2020 by a single surgeon. We compared patient demographics, and pre-, intra-, and post-operative metrics between both groups. Differences between groups were evaluated with Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: Forty-nine patients underwent the standard HoLEP approach, and 46 patients underwent the en-bloc approach. Compared to a standard HoLEP, the en-bloc approach was associated with decreased operative time (131.11 minutes vs 153.59 minutes, P = .007) with similar weights of tissue removed. Operative efficiency, as measured by grams of prostate tissue removed per minute, was greater for the en-bloc approach (0.49 g/min vs 0.36 g/min, P = .005). There was no difference in length of stay (0.91 days vs 0.96 days, P = .383), laser efficiency (4.41 kJ/g vs 4.83 kJ/g, P = .200), or number of post-operative complications (10 vs 6, P = .236) between the groups.

Conclusion: Utilization of the en-bloc technique during the initial learning curve allows for a faster, more efficient operation without any difference in functional outcomes or major complications compared to a standard HoLEP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compared standard
12
initial learning
12
standard holep
12
en-bloc approach
12
enucleation early
8
early apical
8
apical release
8
holmium laser
8
laser enucleation
8
enucleation prostate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!