Background: The Internet is today the largest platform for food distribution, and there are concerns about the impact that digital marketing has in the field of nutrition by promoting non-evidence-based recommendations. The purpose of this study was to describe the user profile that draws on Instagram to follow nutrition-related content versus not, and to analyze the frequency and type of content of the information provided by nutritional influencers.

Methods: A cross-sectional study involving randomly selected United States residents having an Instagram account was performed. Participants completed an anonymous online survey link.

Results: From 898 respondents, 78.7% were women, and 75.6% were Millennials. Scientific evidence present in the posts was 14.3%. Influencers promoted a product or a brand in more than 90% of posts. Women followed more nutrition-related content than men ( < 0.001). Millennials, followed by Generation-Z, followed more nutrition-related content ( < 0.001). There were no significant relationships between the following status of nutrition-related content with BMI, type of job, household income, education degree, or smoking habits.

Conclusions: Women and Millennials followed more nutrition-related content. Scientific evidence was scarce and commercial interest in the network was evident. The vast majority of the posts were not based on scientific evidence and instead promoted a product/supplement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8774557PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11020239DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nutrition-related content
24
scientific evidence
12
united states
8
cross-sectional study
8
nutrition-related
6
content
6
content instagram
4
instagram united
4
states america
4
america analytical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!