It has been widely reported that probiotic consortia in the rhizosphere can enhance the plant resistance to pathogens. However, the general composition and functional profiles of bacterial community in soils which suppress multiple diseases for various plants remain largely unknown. Here, we combined metadata analysis with machine learning to identify the general patterns of bacterial-community composition in disease-suppressive soils. Disease-suppressive soils significantly enriched Firmicutes and Actinobacteria but showed a decrease in Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Our machine-learning models accurately identified the disease-conducive and -suppressive soils with 54 biomarker genera, 28 of which were potentially beneficial. We further carried out a successive passaging experiment with the susceptible rps2 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana invaded by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (avrRpt2) for functional verification of potential beneficial bacteria. The disease-suppressive ability of Kribbella, Nocardioides and Bacillus was confirmed, and they positively activated the pathogen-associated molecular patterns-triggered immunity pathway. Results also showed that chemical control by pesticides in agricultural production decreased the disease-suppressive ability of soil. This study provides a method for accurately predicting the occurrence of multiple diseases in soil and identified potential beneficial bacteria to guide a wide range of multiple-strain biological control strategies in agricultural management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15902 | DOI Listing |
Microbiol Res
March 2025
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture, Harbin 150030, China; Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China. Electronic address:
Cover crops can suppress the following crop diseases and alter soil microbial communities, but the mechanisms of such disease suppressive effects remain uncertain. Here, we studied the effects of brassica and cereal cover crops, along with decomposition solutions from these crop residues, on tomato growth and bacterial wilt. Moreover, tomato rhizosphere microorganisms were analyzed by qPCR and high-throughput sequencing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicroorganisms
November 2024
Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki 036-8561, Japan.
The effect of crop rotation on soil-borne diseases is a representative case of plant-soil feedback in the sense that plant disease resistance is influenced by soils with different cultivation histories. This study examined the microbial mechanisms inducing the differences in the clubroot (caused by pathogen) damage of Chinese cabbage ( subsp. ) after the cultivation of different preceding crops.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicrobiome
November 2024
Université de Rennes, CNRS, UMR 6553 ECOBIO (écosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution), Rennes, 35000, France.
Background: Plant-soil feedback arises from microbial legacies left by plants in the soil. Grafting is a common technique used to prevent yield declines in monocultures. Yet, our understanding of how grafting alters the composition of soil microbiota and how these changes affect subsequent crop performance remains limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFElife
October 2024
Department of Natural Resources, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Agricultural Research Organization (Volcani Institute), Ramat Ishay, Israel.
Hortic Res
October 2024
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, 650201, China.
Developing disease-suppressive soils is an effective approach for managing soilborne diseases, which can be achieved through crop metabolism and root secretion modification to recruit beneficial soil microbiota. Many factors, such as light, can elicit and modify plant metabolomic activities, resulting in disease suppression. To investigate the impact of light, was planted in a greenhouse and forest, conditioned with three levels of light intensities, including the optimal (15% light transmittance of full light), suboptimal low (5% light transmittance of full light) and suboptimal high (30% light transmittance of full light) intensities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!