Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Pedicled flaps are used in orofacial defect reconstruction in older patients and patients with underlying diseases. The submental island flap(SIF)is one type of cervical pedicled flap; however, the modified submental island flap (MSIF), which includes mylohyoid muscle, is a simpler and safer type. Here, we report a clinical study of orofacial defect reconstruction using the MSIF following oral cancer resection.
Patients And Methods: From January 2019 to December 2020, we retrospectively examined 10 cases of reconstruction using the MSIF following oral squamous cell carcinoma resection.
Results: The study population consisted of 7 men and 3 women with a mean age of 76.0(66-88)years. The primary sites were lower gingiva(n=5), tongue(n=3), and buccal mucosa in(n=2). Surgical procedures included marginal mandibulectomy( n=3), segmental mandibulectomy(n=1), partial glossectomy(n=2), hemiglossectomy(n=1), buccal mucosa resection(n=2), and combined partial glossectomy and segmental mandibulectomy(n=1). The average flap size was 61.4×36.0 mm. The average time of flap elevation was 32.4(23-50)minutes. During orofacial surgery using the MSIF, organs adjacent to the primary site could also be reconstructed. There were no complications in any patients.
Conclusion: The MSIF is useful for orofacial defect reconstruction in older patients and patients with underlying diseases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!