There is growing interest in the role that morphological knowledge plays in literacy acquisition, but there is no research directly comparing the efficacy of different forms of morphological instruction. Here we compare two methods of teaching English morphology in the context of a memory experiment when words were organized by affix during study (e.g., a list of words was presented that all share an affix, such as , , , , etc.) or by base during study (e.g., a list of words was presented that all share a base, such as , , , ). We show that memory for morphologically complex words is better in both conditions compared to a control condition that does not highlight the morphological composition of words, and most importantly, show that studying words in a base-centric format improves memory further still. We argue that the morphological matrix that organizes words around a common base may provide an important new tool for literacy instruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8769298PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262260PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tool literacy
8
literacy instruction
8
morphological matrix
8
study list
8
list presented
8
presented share
8
morphological
5
promising tool
4
instruction morphological
4
matrix growing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!