AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the long-term effects of individualized multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement versus routine fluoroscopic methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on heart failure hospitalization and all-cause death among patients.
  • Results showed no significant difference in heart failure hospitalization or overall mortality rates between the imaging-guided and control groups, although a notable reduction in risk was observed in patients with inter-lead electrical delay (IED) of 100 ms or more.
  • The study concludes that while the imaging-guided strategy did not improve outcomes over routine methods, exploring alternatives like targeting the latest electrical activation may enhance LV lead placement in CRT patients.

Article Abstract

Aims: This study aims to investigate the long-term occurrence of the composite endpoint of heart failure (HF) hospitalization or all-cause death (primary endpoint) in patients randomized to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using individualized multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement compared with a routine fluoroscopic approach. Furthermore, this study aims to evaluate whether inter-lead electrical delay (IED) is associated with improved response rate of this endpoint.

Methods And Results: We reviewed follow-up data until November 2020 for all 182 patients included in the ImagingCRT trial for the occurrence of HF hospitalization and all-cause death. During median (inter-quartile range) time to primary endpoint/censuring of 6.7 (3.3-7.9) years, the rate of the primary endpoint was 60% (n = 53) in the imaging group compared with 52% (n = 48) in the control group [hazard ratio (HR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.81, P = 0.31]. Neither the risk of HF hospitalization (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.62-1.99, P = 0.72) nor of all-cause death differed between treatment groups (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.82-1.85, P = 0.32). The risk of the primary endpoint was significantly reduced among those with IED ≥100 ms when compared with those with IED <100 ms (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.98, P = 0.04).

Conclusions: In this study, an individualized multimodality imaging-guided strategy targeting LV lead placement towards the latest mechanically activated non-scarred myocardial segment during CRT implantation did not reduce HF hospitalization or all-cause death when compared with routine LV lead placement during long-term follow-up. Targeting the latest electrical activation should be studied as an alternative individualized strategy for optimizing LV lead placement in CRT recipients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab314DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

all-cause death
12
primary endpoint
12
multimodality imaging-guided
8
imaging-guided left
8
left ventricular
8
ventricular lead
8
lead placement
8
cardiac resynchronization
8
resynchronization therapy
8
study aims
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!