AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to investigate how different doses of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors impact the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in children.
  • Researchers analyzed data from a large registry of patients who began TNF inhibitor treatment and evaluated their responses using established clinical criteria over several months.
  • Results showed that most analyses did not demonstrate a clear link between dosage and treatment success, suggesting that higher doses did not necessarily lead to better outcomes and that confounding factors may have influenced the findings.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine the dose-response relationship of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

Methods: Participants of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry were eligible for inclusion in the analyses if they started TNF inhibition treatment for JIA. The primary treatment response was determined 3 to 7 months after the start of treatment, based on the JIA American College of Rheumatology Pediatric criteria for improvement, clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, and persistence of treatment after 6 months. Subsequently, pooled logistic regression models were performed to include long-term follow-up data. The models were adjusted for risk factors associated with poor treatment response. Dosing was expressed by body weight, body surface area, ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass.

Results: Participants treated with adalimumab (n = 328) and etanercept (n = 437) were included in the analyses (median dose 0.82 mg/kg body weight [interquartile range (IQR) 0.66-1.04] and 0.83 mg/kg body weight [IQR 0.75-0.95], respectively). The majority of analyses did not show a relationship between dose and outcome. Where associations were found, results were conflicting. Alternative dosing characteristics based on ideal body weight, fat free mass, and lean body mass did not result in stronger or more consistent associations.

Conclusion: This study was not able to confirm our hypothesis that increased dosing of TNF inhibitors results in improved treatment outcomes. Although adjustment was performed for risk factors of impaired treatment response, residual confounding by indication likely explains the negative associations found in this study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr.24859DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body weight
20
treatment response
12
juvenile idiopathic
8
idiopathic arthritis
8
childhood arthritis
8
arthritis rheumatology
8
rheumatology alliance
8
alliance registry
8
tnf inhibition
8
treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!